diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Žan Smrekar (Author), Bojan Tičar (Mentor)

Abstract

Z diplomsko nalogo sem raziskal Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju ter Pravilnik o opravljanju službe izvršitelja in ostalo strokovno literaturo, ki ureja izvršilni postopek v Sloveniji. Živimo v času, kjer je zadolževanje skoraj neizbežno, ker pa včasih dolg ne uspe biti poravnan ustrezno med strankama samima, vskoči v zadevo država. Država je praktične naloge izvršbe zaupala izvršiteljem, ki so samozaposleni in delujejo pod nadzorom Zbornice izvršiteljev Slovenije in Ministrstva za pravosodje. Slovenski Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju je bil večkrat noveliran, saj je bodisi varoval dolžnika in je izvršilni postopek veljal za neučinkovitega, bodisi pa privilegiral upnika ter hitrost postopka. Zato je za vse novele zakona veljalo: dva koraka naprej, eden nazaj. Zakonodajalec mora biti pozoren tako na pravice upnika kot dolžnika ter urediti zakon tako, da nobena izmed strank ne zavlačuje postopka brez razloga ter nikogaršnje človekove pravice niso kršene. Izvršba, ki temelji na verodostojni listini, ki jo prejme Centralni oddelek za verodostojno listino, je vložena elektronsko preko spletnega portala in prispeva k razbremenitvi sodišča, saj je ni potrebno vložiti pisno. Čeprav je naš zakon napisan po vzoru avstrijskega zakona o izvršbi, je še vedno opaziti razlike med zakonodajama Avstrije in Slovenije zaradi zgodovinskih in ostalih razlogov. Primerjal pa bom tudi slovenski zakon z ureditvijo izvršilnega področja v Nemčiji. V diplomskem delu sem raziskal največje razlike med državami ter kako poteka čezmejna izvršba v Evropski uniji. S pomočjo pravnih metod sem področje izvršilnega prava raziskal takšnega, kot je zapisan v zakonih, kot tudi s pomočjo strokovnih člankov pregledal, kako naj bi bil zakon v prihodnosti urejen (lat.: de lege ferenda). Na koncu dela pa sem predstavil predloge za izboljšavo in pregledal trenutno stanje v Sloveniji.

Keywords

diplomske naloge;izvršba;izvršitelj;izvršba v Nemčiji in Avstriji;Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju;Centralni oddelek za verodostojno listino;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher: [Ž. Smrekar]
UDC: 351(043.2)
COBISS: 3864042 Link will open in a new window
Views: 728
Downloads: 97
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Legal regulation of claim enforcement in practice
Secondary abstract: In my university degree thesis, I have researched Claim Enforcement and Security Act, Rules on the performance of bailiff services and other professional literature in the field of enforcement procedure here in Slovenia. We live in a time where building debt overtime is almost inevitable and when debt fails to be settled between the parties properly, comes the role of court. The court has entrusted the practical tasks of all enforcement procedures to the Bailiffs, who are self-employed and act under the control of the Chamber of Bailiffs and Ministry of Justice. Claim Enforcement and Security Act has been regularly amended, because it either overly protected the debtor and therefore made the Claim Enforcement and Security Act inefficient, or it privileged the creditor and the speed of the proceedings. All amendments had something in common: it moved two steps forward and one step back. The legislator must pay attention to both, the creditor and the debtor’s rights and after regulating the law accordingly, so that neither party delays the proceedings and no one’s human rights are violated. Claim Enforcement based on a genuine document is received by the Central Department of Genuine Document and is filed automatically through and online portal. This contributes to lowering the burden of the courts as it does not have to be filed in writing. Even though the Claim Enforcement and Security Act is based on the Austrian act, there are still differences between the laws of Austria and Slovenia for historical and other reasons. I will also compare the law and regulation in Slovenia with laws in Germany. With my university degree thesis, I have also analyzed the biggest differences between countries and how cross-border claim enforcement is being regulated in the European Union. With the help of legal methods, I explored the field of enforcement law in theory, as enshrined in the laws. I have also read several professional articles on the topic of how the law should be regulated in the future – de lege ferenda. At the end of my work I have also presented suggestions for improvement and reviewed the current status in Slovenia.
Secondary keywords: Claim enforcement;Bailiff;claim enforcement in Germany and Austria;Claim Enforcement and Security Act;Central Department of Genuine Document.;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages: VI, 48 str.
ID: 11534056