diplomsko delo
Domen Puš (Author), Mitja Durnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Posebne enote so pomemben element hibridnega vojskovanja. Hibridno vojskovanje združuje konvencionalno in nekonvencionalno vojskovanje. Posebne enote pa so del nekonvencionalnega vojskovanja. Izvajajo nekonvencionalno vojskovanje, čeprav so del konvencionalne vojske, kar je le eno izmed številnih zanimivih protislovij. Hibridno vojskovanje v modernem svetu je ponovno vzbudilo zanimanje za posebne enote zaradi primerov, kot so dogodki na Krimu leta 2014 in tajna operacija Neptunova sulica. Hibridno vojskovanje postaja vse bolj pomembno, saj se z napredkom tehnologije razvijajo novi načini bojevanja. Posebne enote so odraz družbe, v kateri delujejo, njihove taktike in delovanje se izražajo v načinu dela. Na posebne enote vpliva tudi razvoj nekonvencionalnega vojskovanja, saj tehnologija in splošni napredek prinašata inovacije v vojskovanju. Hibridno vojskovanje je postalo večji del bojevanja v modernem času in je zaradi kompleksnih politik in odnosov med državami pogosteje uporabljeno. Cilj diplomske naloge je primerjava posebnih enot Rusije in Združenih držav Amerike, ki se razlikujejo v številnih pogledih, kot so uporaba opreme, filozofija, taktike, tajne operacije, zgodovina in sestava. Na ta način želimo ugotoviti, kaj jih razlikuje in v katero smer se je razvilo hibridno vojskovanje v teh dveh različnih okoljih. V analitičnem delu so analizirane posebne enote Združenih držav Amerike in Rusije in navedene ugotovitve glavnih razlik, ki jih ločujejo v načinu hibridnega vojskovanja. Ugotovili smo, da v Rusiji pojmujejo hibridno vojskovanje oziroma hibridno vojno drugače kot v Združenih državah Amerike, kar pojasnjuje razliko v taktikah in implementaciji posebnih enot. Posebne enote teh dveh držav pa se razlikujejo predvsem v smislu različnih filozofij in zgodovine.

Keywords

posebne enote;hibridno vojskovanje;filozofija;diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FU - Faculty of Administration
Publisher: [D. Puš]
UDC: 35
COBISS: 26576131 Link will open in a new window
Views: 655
Downloads: 271
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Comparative analysis of the use of special units of selected countries as a part of a hybrid war
Secondary abstract: Special forces are an important element hybrid warfare. Hybrid warfare combines conventional and unconventional warfare. Special forces, however, are part of unconventional warfare. They carry out unconventional warfare, even though they are part of the conventional military, which is just one of many contradictions that are interesting. Hybrid warfare in the modern world has once again aroused interest in special units in cases such as the 2014 events in Crimea and the special Operation Neptune Spear. Hybrid warfare is becoming more and more important as technology advances so do new ways of warfare. Special forces are a reflection of the society that surrounds them, so their tactics and actions are reflected in their way of operating. Special forces are also affected by the advancement of unconventional warfare, because with technology and general advances, warfare innovation also occurs. Hybrid warfare has become a major part of modern-day warfare, as it is used more because of complex policies and relationships between countries. The aim of this diploma thesis is to compare the special units of Russia and the United States of America, which are different in many ways, such as in the use of equipment, philosophy, tactics, covert operations, history and composition, to determine what separates them and in what direction has hybrid warfare developed in these environments. In the analytical part, I analyzed the special units of the United States and Russia and identified the main differences that distinguish them in aspects of hybrid warfare. I have found that in Russia hybrid warfare, or Hybrid war is interpreted differently than in the United States of America, which explains the difference in tactics and implementation of special forces. The special forces of the two countries differ mainly because of their different philosophies and histories.
Secondary keywords: special forces;hybrid warfare;unconventional warfare;philosophy;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 1000529
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Pages: XI, 44 str.
ID: 11718203
Recommended works:
, primer Grand hotela Union
, diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Informacijska varnost
, no subtitle data available