magistrsko delo
Jure Šegota (Author), Bojan Dobovšek (Mentor)

Abstract

Tako plagiatorstvo kot ponarejanje in črni trg z zaključnimi deli so dandanes pogost način pridobivanja akademskega naziva. Do omenjene akademske nepoštenosti prihaja kljub temu, da so ugotovljene kršitve lahko kazensko ovadene, kar navajata Kazenski zakonik ter Statut posamezne univerze, poleg tega gre tudi za kršenje avtorskih pravic prvotnega avtorja, katerih ideje oseba prevzema kot lastne ali katerega delo kopira. Na posameznika, ki se poslužuje nezakonitih načinov pridobivanja strokovnega naziva, vpliva več različnih individualnih/psiholoških in družbeno-socialnih faktorjev. Na višji odstotek pojavljanja plagiatorstva tako vpliva digitalizacija in vedno lažja dostopnost informacij na spletu, prav tako vplivajo kultura in šolski sistem, s čimer je povezana tudi seznanjenost študentov s konceptom plagiatorstva. V slovenskem okolju so medijsko bolj izpostavljene afere nezakonitega pridobivanja zaključnih listin in nazivov v javnem sektorju, kjer so posamezniki po ugotovljenih kršitvah večinoma ostali brez strokovnih nazivov ali pa so bili razrešeni z delovnega mesta. Ponarejeno diplomo lahko ugotovimo s primerjavo listine s sklepi o vsebini in obliki diplom, plagiatorstvu pa se lahko, med drugim, izognemo tudi z uporabo plačljivih ali brezplačnih programov za detekcijo plagiatorstva (Turnitin, DKUM, Free Plagiarism checker …), ki vneseno besedilo primerjajo z bazo vsebin. Avtomatizirane procese za ugotavljanja plagiatorstva vedno bolj pogosto uporabljajo tudi izobraževalne ustanove po vsem svetu, s čimer želijo zmanjšati pojav akademske nepoštenosti, vendar pa je za določanje plagiatorstva še vedno potrebno človeško oko.

Keywords

uradne listine;nezakonito pridobivanje;ponarejanje;plagiatorstvo;detekcija plagiatorstva;magistrska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher: [J. Šegota]
UDC: 343.523(043.2)
COBISS: 18518275 Link will open in a new window
Views: 640
Downloads: 70
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Illegal acquisition of offical education documents
Secondary abstract: Plagiarism, forgery and black market for education documents are nowadays a common way of obtaining an academic title. The aforementioned academic dishonesty occurs despite the fact that the violations can be criminally prosecuted, as stated by the Criminal Code and the Statute of the respective university. Plagiarism is also a violation of the copyright of the original author whose ideas the person presents as his own or whose work he copies. An individual who resorts to illegal means of obtaining a professional title is affected by several different individual/psychological and social factors. The higher percentage of plagiarism is thus influenced by digitalisation and the easy accessibility of information online, as well as by the culture and the school system, which is also linked with students' awareness of the concept of plagiarism. In the Slovenian environment, the affairs about illegal acquisition of education documents are more common or more publicly exposed in the public sector. Individuals, who were found guilty of plagiarism or forgery have mostly lost their professional titles or were dismissed from their jobs. Counterfeit diploma can be identified by comparing the document with the agreement on the content and form of diplomas. Plagiarism can be avoided by using paid or free plagiarism detection programs such as Turnitin, DKUM, Free Plagiarism Checker and others, which compare the text with content base. Automated processes for the detection of plagiarism are increasingly used by educational institutions around the world to reduce the incidence of academic dishonesty, although the human eye is still required to determine plagiarism.
Secondary keywords: forgery;plagiarism;plagiarism detection programs;plagiarism affairs;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages: VIII, 56 str.
ID: 11807737