ǂa ǂ Central European Cooperative Oncology Group analysis
Tanja Čufer (Author), Tudor Ciuleanu (Author), Peter Berzinec (Author), Gabriela Galffy (Author), Marko Jakopović (Author), Jacek Jassem (Author), Dragana Jovanovic (Author), Zhasmina MIhaylova (Author), Gyula Ostoros (Author), Christiane Thallinger (Author), Milada Zemanova (Author), Christoph Zielinski (Author)

Abstract

Background. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved substantially in the last decades. Novel targeted and immune-oncologic drugs were introduced into routine treatment. Despite accelerated development and subsequent drug registrations by the European Medicinal Agency (EMA), novel drugs for NSCLC are poorly accessible in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Material and Methods. The Central European Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a survey among experts from 10 CEE countries to provide an overview on the availability of novel drugs for NSCLC and time from registration to reimbursement decision in their countries. Results. Although first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were reimbursed and available in all countries, for other registered therapies - even for ALK inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors in first-line - there were apparent gaps in availability and/or reimbursement. There was a trend for better availability of drugs with longer time from EMA marketing authorization. Substantial differences in access to novel drugs among CEE countries were observed. In general, the availability of drugs is not in accordance with the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS), as defined by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Time spans between drug registrations and national decisions on reimbursement vary greatly, from less than 3 months in one country to more than 1 year in the majority of countries. Conclusion. The access to novel drugs for NSCLC in CEE countries is suboptimal. To enable access to the most effective compounds within the shortest possible time, reimbursement decisions should be faster and ESMO MCBS should be incorporated into decision making.

Keywords

nedrobnocelični rak pljuč;zdravljenje;nova zdravila;Srednja Evropa;Jugovzhodna Evropa;non-small cell lung cancer;treatment;novel drugs;Central Europe;Southeastern Europe;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Publisher: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press
UDC: 616-006
COBISS: 2048592241 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1549-490X
Views: 1200
Downloads: 653
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary keywords: Carcinoma, non-small cell lung;Therapy;Europe;Eastern Europe;Drug therapy;Nedrobnocelični karcinom pljuč;Terapija;Evropa;Vzhodna Evropa;Terapija z zdravili;
Source comment: Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 6. 12. 2019;
Pages: str. e598-e601
Volume: ǂVol. ǂ25
Issue: ǂiss. ǂ3
Chronology: Mar. 2020
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0523
ID: 11915344
Recommended works:
, ǂa ǂ Central European Cooperative Oncology Group analysis
, diagnostic procedures and treatment reimbursement surveyed by the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group