diplomsko delo
Jaroslava Zver (Author), Valentina Hlebec (Mentor)

Abstract

Pri raziskovanju družboslovnih pojavov je eden ključnih procesov zbiranje podatkov. Glede na to, da lahko zbiramo različne vrste informacij, v skladu s tem poznamo tudi različne metode zbiranja le - teh. Vsaka metoda pa ima lahko zelo velik vpliv na to koliko in katere podatke bomo zbrali ter koliko izmed teh bo kakovostnih - uporabnih za nadaljnjo analizo. Prav tako je izjemnega pomena instrument s katerim zbiramo podatke, ki nas zanimajo. Preden se lotimo analize je potrebno ugotoviti kako primeren je izbran instrument za zbiranje podatkov, ki predstavljajo glavni cilj naše raziskave. V diplomski nalogi bom na konkretnem primeru anketnega vprašalnika primerjala ugotovitve o kakovosti anketnega vprašalnika glede na izbrane metode kognitivnega laboratorija. Na podlagi ankete PANOCYC, ki vključuje 20 trditev na temo oskrbovanja smo zbirali podatke o kakovosti tega vprašalnika s pomočjo različnih kvalitativnih metod kognitivnega laboratorija. Na podlagi zbranih podatkov želim ugotoviti do kakšnih podatkov nas privedejo različne metode kognitivnega laboratorija oz. kakšne vidike kakovosti lahko odkrijemo s posameznimi metodami. Med seboj bom primerjala naslednje metode: online kognitivno intervjuvanje in offline kognitivno intervjuvanje izvedeno s pomočjo izbranih tehnik: tehnika glasnega razmišljanja, tehnika pojasnjevalnih vprašanj in tehnika podajanja definicij Prav tako bom analizirala ter primerjala ugotovitve o kakovosti omenjenega vprašalnika.

Keywords

kognitivni intervju;kakovost vprašalnika;oskrbovanje;Družboslovno raziskovanje;Metodologija;Intervjuji;Diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: [J. Zver]
UDC: 303(043.2)
COBISS: 30279427 Link will open in a new window
Views: 362
Downloads: 70
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The effect of selected methods of the cognitive laboratory for testing the quality of questionnaires on the identified problems of the questionnaire
Secondary abstract: In researching social phenomena, one of the key processes is data collection. Given that we can collect all types of information, we know other methods of collecting them accordingly. However, each method can have a very large impact on how much data could be collected and how much of it will be useful for further analysis. The type of instrument used in collecting the data is also very important. Before we start analyzing the data, we must determine how suitable the chosen instrument of data collection was for our purpose. In the dissertation we will compare findings about the quality of the chosen questionnaire based on the chosen methods of the cognitive laboratory. Based on the PANOCYC questionnaire, which consist of 20 statements regarding caring, we collected data about the quality of the questionnaire using different qualitative methods of the cognitive laboratory. Based on the gathered data we try to determine what kind of data we get by using different methods of cognitive laboratory. We will compare the following methods: online cognitive interview and offline cognitive interview with selected techniques: think-aloud, verbal probing and definitions. I will also analyze and compare the findings on the quality of this questionnaire.
Secondary keywords: cognitive interview;quality questions;caring;Social science research;Methodology;Interviews;Graduate theses;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages: 55 str.
ID: 12035119