diplomsko delo
Abstract
Testiranje programske opreme danes igra zelo pomembno vlogo med razvojnim procesom. Ampak ročno testiranje je dokaj zamudno, zato postopek testiranja avtomatiziramo. Avtomatiziramo lahko tudi dostavo novih različic opreme k uporabnikom. To imenujemo neprekinjena integracija/postavitev (CI/CD). Na voljo je veliko platform, ki omogočajo funkcionalnosti CI/CD. Toda katero izbrati?
V nalogi so predstavljene in med seboj primerjane tri platforme - GitHub, Bitbucket in GitLab. Osredotočil sem se na njihove CI/CD funkcionalnosti in izvedbo le teh, primerjal pa sem tudi monetizacijo platform in funkcije, ki jih ponujajo. Ugotovil sem, da je izvedba CI/CD funkcionalnosti zelo podobna na vseh izbranih platformah, ter da se vsaka platforma s svojimi funkcijami osredotoča na drug del trga. Za konec sem podal še priporočila za različne vrste ekip in podjetji.
Keywords
neprekinjena integracija;neprekinjena postavitev;platforme;GitHub;Bitbucket;GitLab;računalništvo;računalništvo in informatika;visokošolski strokovni študij;diplomske naloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2020 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UL FRI - Faculty of Computer and Information Science |
Publisher: |
[N. Ačkun] |
UDC: |
004(043.2) |
COBISS: |
31936003
|
Views: |
791 |
Downloads: |
183 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Review and comparison of platforms with CI/CD functionalities |
Secondary abstract: |
Software testing plays a vital role in today's software development. But manual testing is often quite time intensive, so the testing procedure is automated. We can also automate the delivery process of new versions of our software to the end customer. This is called continuous integration/deployment. There is a wide variety of platforms that support CI/CD functionalities, but which one to choose?
In this document I have reviewed and compared three different platforms - GitHub, Bitbucket and GitLab. I focused on the execution of their CI/CD functionalities, while also comparing their monetization and other functions they offer. My analysis shows that the execution of CI/CD functionality is very similar on all three compared platforms and that each platform focuses on a different part of the market. In the final chapter I also added some recommendations for different types of teams and companies. |
Secondary keywords: |
continuous integration;continuous deployment;platforms;GitHub;Bitbucket;GitLab;computer science;computer and information science;diploma; |
Type (COBISS): |
Bachelor thesis/paper |
Study programme: |
1000470 |
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): |
1970-01-01 |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za računalništvo in informatiko |
Pages: |
57 str. |
ID: |
12036981 |