Alternativno reševanje sporov v upravnih zadevah

(magistrska diplomska naloga)

Petra Miklašič (Author), Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc (Mentor)

Abstract

Alternativno reševanje sporov (ARS) na upravnem področju se je preko koncepta dobrega javnega upravljanja in z njim povezane evropeizacije upravnega procesnega prava začelo razvijati tudi v Evropi. V primerjavi s civilnim področjem upravno pravo primarno varuje javno korist, zato je uporaba ARS omejena oz. upravnemu področju specifična. Pozitivne lastnosti vpeljave ARS v upravnih zadevah se večinoma povezujejo z racionalizacijo upravnih postopkov, saj ARS pripomore k zmanjševanju zaostankov in preobremenjenosti upravno-sodnega odločanja. ARS ne sme biti nadomestilo sodnega sistema, ampak mora predstavljati njegovo dopolnilo, ki subjektom daje možnost soodločanja o poteku postopka in končni odločitvi. Sedanja ureditev že vključuje zametke ARS preko institutov, ki v posledici predstavljajo alternativo upravnemu ali sodnemu postopku. Vpeljava in uporaba mehanizmov ARS v upravnih zadevah mora biti premišljena in mora slediti tehtnemu premisleku, kaj je smisel njihove uporabe oz. katere so funkcije in naloge, ki bi jih uporaba ARS v upravnih zadevah imela. V magistrski nalogi so predstavljene obstoječe oblike ARS v upravnih zadevah v Sloveniji in možne zakonodajne rešitve, ki bi v slovenski pravni red implementirale metode ARS v upravnih zadevah. Poleg sprejema ustrezne zakonodaje je pomembno zagotoviti ustrezno informiranost upravnih organov in spodbuditi njihovo proaktivno delovanje.

Keywords

alternativno reševanje sporov;upravna zadeva;mediacija;poravnava;javna korist;upravni postopek;sporazum;upravni organ;pravica do dobre javne uprave;upravna pogodba;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2020
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[P. Miklašič]
UDC:	347:351(043.2)
COBISS:	32256259
Views:	608
Downloads:	174
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Alternative Dispute Resolution in Administrative Matters
Secondary abstract:	Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in administrative field of law in European Union has developed due to doctrine of good governance and Europeanization of administrative procedural law. Being compared to civil law, administrative law primarily protects public benefit, which consequentially leads to restrictions regarding the use of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative field. Implementing alternative dispute resolution in the administrative field leads to benefits, which are mainly connected with rationalization of administrative procedures, as it reduces court backlogs and lessens the burden of administrative and judicial decision-making. ADR should not be a substitute for the judicial system, it should rather complement the system, giving subjects the opportunity to contribute in the procedure and the final decision. Current regulations already include ADR through institutes, which represent alternatives to administrative or judicial proceedings. The introduction and use of ADR mechanisms in the administrative field must be well thought out and must take into account the function and goals that ADR strives to follow. This master's thesis presents relevant ADR methods in administrative matters in Slovenia and possible legislative solutions that would implement ADR methods in the Slovenian legal order. In addition to the adoption of appropriate legislation, it is important to ensure that administrative bodies are properly informed and to encourage their proactive use.
Secondary keywords:	alternative dispute resolution;administrative matter;mediation;settlement;public benefit;administrative body;administrative procedure;agreement;good governance;administrative contract;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	51 f.
ID:	12058556