magistrsko diplomsko delo
Tina Anželj (Author), Rajko Pirnat (Mentor)

Abstract

V magistrskem diplomskem delu z naslovom »Sodno varstvo v postopkih javnega naročanja« proučim vse tri postopke sodnega varstva, ki jih ureja Zakon o pravnem varstvu v postopkih javnega naročanja. Najprej se opredelim do izpodbojnosti pogodbe o javnem naročanju in v čem se ta razlikuje od izpodbojnosti pogodbe po Obligacijskem zakoniku ter nadaljujem s pregledom kršitev, ki lahko vodijo v izpodbojnost pogodbe. Naslednji večji sklop naloge obsega vprašanja odškodninske odgovornosti in povrnitve škode v postopkih javnega naročanja. Glavne ugotovitve tega poglavja so, da je odškodninska odgovornost v Zakonu o pravnem varstvu v postopkih javnega naročanja zelo skopo urejena, zato večji del vsebine sloni na sodni praksi in pravni teoriji. Obsežen del poglavja je namenjen ugotavljanju, katere kategorije oseb so upravičene do povračila škode v postopkih javnega naročanja in do kakšnega obsega škode je posamezna kategorija oseb upravičena. Povračilo škode je v slovenskem pravnem redu zadovoljivo urejeno, še zmeraj pa ostaja odprtih nekaj vprašanj, kjer se bo vprašanje povračila škode v prihodnosti skozi sodno prakso (predvidoma) nadalje razvijalo. Sodno varstvo v postopkih javnega naročanja v slovenskem pravnem redu zaokroži upravni spor, ki ga je možno vložiti zoper odločitve Državne revizijske komisije. Gre za novost v slovenski zakonodaji (institut se v praksi začne uporabljati šele leta 2021), čeprav je tovrstno sodno varstvo v evropskih državah že dlje časa uveljavljeno. V sklopu tega poglavja tako predstavim stanje, kakršno je bilo pred uzakonitvijo instituta upravnega spora in na kakšen način je zakonodajalec uredil naveden institut v Zakonu o pravnem varstvu v postopkih javnega naročanja.

Keywords

javna naročila;javno naročanje;sodno varstvo;izpodbojnost pogodbe;povračilo škode;upravni spor;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [T. Anželj]
UDC: 351.712:347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 39916803 Link will open in a new window
Views: 617
Downloads: 150
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Judicial protection in public procurement procedures
Secondary abstract: In my master's thesis entitled "Judicial protection in public procurement procedures", I review all three judicial protection procedures regulated by the Legal Protection in Public Procurement Procedures Act. First of all, I comment on the voidability of the public procurement contract and how it differs from the voidability of the contract under the Obligations Code, and continue with the review of violations that may lead to the voidability of the contract. The next major chapter of thesis covers the issues of liability for damages and compensation for damage in public procurement procedures. The main findings of this chapter are that liability in the Legal Protection in Public Procurement Procedures Act is very sparsely regulated, hence most of the content therein is based on case law and legal theory. The greater part of the content is intended to determine which categories of persons are entitled to compensation in public procurement procedures and to what extent each category of persons is entitled. I conclude the chapter by stating that compensation for damages is satisfactorily regulated in the Slovenian legal system, however there are still some open questions where compensation for damage will (presumably) develop further in the future through case law. Judicial protection in public procurement procedures in the Slovenian legal system is completed by the administrative dispute that can be filed against the decisions of the National Review Commission. This is a novelty in Slovenian legislation (the institute will not be used in practice until 2021), although such judicial protection has been established in European countries for a long time. As part of this chapter, the situation as it was before the legalization of the institute of administrative dispute and the manner in which the legislator regulated this institute in the Legal Protection in Public Procurement Procedures Act is presented.
Secondary keywords: public procurement;judicial protection;voidability of the contract;compensation for damage;administrative dispute;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 54 f.
ID: 12146249