Primerjalna analiza obtožbe državnega funkcionarja

diplomsko delo

Danijela Golob (Author), Arne Mavčič (Mentor)

Abstract

Z institutom ustavne obtožbe (impeachmenta) je definiran postopek obtožbe najvišjih državnih funkcionarjev zaradi hujše kršitve ustave in zakonov. Z drugimi besedami: to je institut za ugotavljanje njihove kazenske odgovornosti % odgovornosti za posamezna protipravna dejanja % in mehanizem za uresničevanje te odgovornosti, s katerim se ob potrdilni obtožbi kaznuje najvišjega državnega funkcionarja. Za lažje razumevanje smo na začetku diplomske naloge najprej opisali pravno teorijo, ki se ukvarja s problematiko instituta šefa države v različnih skupinah državnih ureditev, in odgovornost posameznih državnih funkcionarjev. Temu sledita zgodovinski pregled instituta in predstavitev razvoja ter kazenske odgovornosti državnih funkcionarjev. Med raziskovanjem smo uporabili deskriptivno metodo, s katero smo opisali ključne pojme, ki so povezani s pravno ureditvijo, in primerjalno metodo, da bi ugotovili podobnosti in razlike med državami glede na to, kako se postopek izvede, ter glede na njegove posledice. V končnem poglavju smo se osredotočili na primere obtožb v različnih državah, ki so nam omogočili potrditev hipoteze. Z diplomsko nalogo smo želeli prikazati pomembnost tega instituta % ki ga imajo nekatere države, tudi Slovenija, zapisanega v ustavi % za prevzemanje odgovornosti ob kršitvi.

Keywords

pravna država;politična odgovornost;kazenska odgovornost;sankcije;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2020
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica
Publisher:	[D. Golob]
UDC:	342(043.2)
COBISS:	34026499
Views:	3
Downloads:	1
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The institute of impeachment defines the procedure for accusing the highest state officials of a severe infringement of the constitution and laws. In other words: it is an institute for determining their criminal responsibility-responsibility for individual illegal acts-and an accountability mechanism, which punishes the highest state officials if the charge brought against them are confirmed. To facilitate understanding, the thesis first introduces the legal theory behind the institute of the head of state in various groups of state regulations, and the responsibility/accountability of individual state officials. This is followed by a historical overview of the institute and a presentation of the development and criminal responsibility of state officials. During the research, a descriptive method was applied to describe critical concepts related to legal regulation and a comparative method was employed to identify similarities and differences among different countries in terms of how the procedure is performed and in terms of its consequences. In the concluding chapter, we focused on cases of impeachments in different countries that allowed us to confirm the hypothesis. The thesis aimed to demonstrate the significance of this institute-which some countries, including Slovenia, enshrined in their respective constitutions-for accountability in case of a violation.
Secondary keywords:	impeachment;
Type (COBISS):	Final reflection paper
Thesis comment:	Evropska pravna fakulteta
Source comment:	Univerzitetni študijski program Pravo I. stopnje; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 25. 10. 2020;
Pages:	45 str.
ID:	12208344