(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Marjanca Ambrožič (Author), Bruna Žuber (Mentor)

Abstract

Pravica do obrazložene odločbe je v sodobni pravni državi eno izmed temeljnih jamstev poštenega postopka in hkrati tudi temeljni element procesne zakonitosti, katere cilj je varstvo pravic strank v postopku. Jasna, celovita in vsebinska obrazložitev stranki omogoča, da se seznani z razlogi za odločitev in prispeva v lažjemu sprejemanju odločitve. Hkrati je obrazložitev tudi predpostavka za vložitev učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, v katerem se presoja zakonitost odločitve, kar posredno preprečuje arbitrarnost odločanja organov oblasti. Odločba je enostranski in oblastni akt, ki ga izda upravni ali drug državni organ, organ samoupravne lokalne skupnosti ali nosilec javnega pooblastila v okviru oblastne funkcije kot nadrejeni subjekt, zaradi česar je procesna zakonitost pri posamičnih aktih še posebej pomembna. Magistrsko diplomsko delo pravico do obrazložene odločbe v upravnem postopku in v upravnem sporu obravnava tako z vidika njenih ustavnih podlag kot tudi z vidika Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in prava Evropske unije. Osredotoča se na obseg obveznosti obrazložitve in standarde, ki veljajo za obrazložitev upravnih in sodnih aktov na nacionalni in evropski ravni. Avtorica analizira pozitivnopravno ureditev obrazložitve odločbe v upravnem postopku in v upravnem sporu v slovenskem pravnem redu ter nato obširno analizira sodno prakso Upravnega sodišča in Vrhovnega sodišča v zvezi s pravico do obrazložene odločbe. Na koncu predstavi še trende razvoja pravice do obrazložene odločbe v upravnem postopku in v upravnem sporu tako z vidika slovenskega kot tudi z vidika evropskega pravnega reda.

Keywords

pravica do obrazložene odločbe;pravica do poštenega sojenja;procesna zakonitost;upravni postopek;upravni spor;upravna odločba;sodna odločba;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Ambrožič]
UDC: 342(043.2)
COBISS: 45021443 Link will open in a new window
Views: 643
Downloads: 210
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: ǂThe ǂright to a reasoned decision in administrative procedure and administrative dispute between theory and practice
Secondary abstract: In the modern state based on the rule of law, the right to a reasoned decision is one the most important procedural safeguards as well as a fundamental element of procedural legality the aim of which is the protection of the parties’ rights. Precise, comprehensive and substantial reasoning enables the party to get acquainted with the reasons for the decision and contributes to a greater acceptance of the decision. Moreover, a reasoned decision is a prerequisite for an effective remedy in which the legality of the decision is being reviewed and which indirectly prevents arbitrary decisions of the public authorities. A decision is a unilateral and authoritative measure, issued by competent administrative or other government authority, local authority or bearer of public authority as a superior body in the context of exercising of public authority. Therefore, the procedural legality of individual acts is particularly important. The thesis addresses the right to a reasoned decision in administrative procedure and administrative dispute in the light of its constitutional basis as well as in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights and EU law. The thesis aims to focus on the scope of the obligation to provide reasons as well as on standards of reasoning for administrative and judicial decisions at the national and European level. The author analyses the national regulation of reasoning for a decision in administrative procedure and administrative dispute and analyses the Administrative Court’s and Supreme Court’s case law in relation to the obligation to provide reasons. Lastly, the author analyses the trends in development of the right to a reasoned decision in administrative procedure and administrative dispute both at European and national level.
Secondary keywords: right to a reasoned decision;right to a fair trial;procedural legality;administrative procedure;administrative dispute;administrative decision;judicial decision;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: VI, 46 f.
ID: 12259920