Spolno občutljiva raba jezika v spontanem formalnem javnem diskurzu

Abstract

Prispevek se osredotoča na spolno (ne)občutljiv jezik, ki ni seksističen sam po sebi, temveč je takšna njegova raba. Diskriminacija izhaja iz širšega konteksta, v katerem se kažeta neenakost in neenakopravnost med ženskami in moškimi. Temeljni pojmi prispevka so diskurz, analiza diskurza ter kritična analiza diskurza kot pristop k analizi. Poseben poudarek je namenjen spolno občutljivi rabi jezika v slovenščini in njenim problematičnim kategorijam, izpostavljeni sta predvsem dve. S pomočjo KAD je v raziskavi opravljena analiza štirih pogovornih oddaj Polnočni klub. Analiza služi ugotavljanju razlik med voditeljema, moškim in žensko, pri stereotipnem vedenju do gostov in pri uporabi spolno (ne)občutljivega jezika.

Keywords

slovenščina;spontani govor;raba jezika;spolno občutljiva raba jezika;spontani formalni javni diskurz;kritična analizta diskurza;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2017
Typology:	1.08 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
UDC:	811.163.6'27
COBISS:	64594530
Views:	300
Downloads:	157
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The paper focuses on gender (in)sensitive language, which is not in itself sexist, but which becomes so through the way it is used. Discrimination arises from a wider context in which inequality between men and women arises. The basic concepts applied are discourse, discourse analysis and critical discourse analysis. Particular emphasis is paid to the gender sensitive use of language in Slovene and two of its problematic categories. A critical discourse analysis of four broadcasts of the discussion programme Polnočni klub (Midnight Club) is carried out. The analysis serves to identify the differences between male and female presenters with regard to stereotypical behaviour towards guests and the use of gender (in)sensitive language.
Secondary keywords:	Slovenian;spontaneous speech;use of language;gender sensitive language use;spontaneous formal public discourse;critical discourse analysis;
Pages:	Str. 131-134
DOI:	10.4312/SSJLK.53.131-134
ID:	12352479