Igor Ivašković (Author)

Abstract

Temeljna je ambicija ovog članka analizirati pitanje pravnog (dis)kontinuiteta između Kraljevine Srbije i Kraljevine SHS u kontekstu međunarodnog spora između njemačke i Kraljevine SHS te pritom otkriti uzroke različitih tumačenja presude u predmetnom sporu. Autor najprije, služeći se tehnikama povijesno-pravne i analitičke metode pri proučavanju dokumenata i sekundarnih mišljenja političara te ustavnih pravnika, daje kratak pregled međunarodnih okolnosti koje su omogućile formiranje poslijeratnih država, nakon čega sažima različite stavove o pravnom statusu Države SHS i karakteru Prvoprosinačkog akta, koristeći pritom tadašnje i današnje međunarodnopravne i ustavnopravne kriterije. nakon toga u okviru razmatranja središnjeg pitanja zaključuje kako je tadašnje tumačenje ivana Žolgera, kako je unatoč presudi u predmetnom sporu Kraljevina SHS ipak bila nova država jer ista nije stvorena u skladu s Ustavom Kraljevine Srbije, pravno najdosljednije. Pored konstatacije kako je Država SHS zadovoljavala temeljne kriterije državnosti te da je formiranje Kraljevine SHS prekinulo ustavnopravni kontinuitet Kraljevine Srbije, doprinos studije očituje se i kroz argumentaciju kako različita pravna shvaćanja u ovom predmetu ipak nisu bila toliko rezultat pravnih dvoumica, već su u prvom redu bila odraz jedne od mnogih političkih bitaka između sukobljenih državnih ideologija.

Keywords

Kraljevina SHS;status;ustave;zgodovina;

Data

Language: Croatian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.02 - Review Article
Organization: UL EF - Faculty of Economics
UDC: 341
COBISS: 45044483 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0352-5317
Views: 259
Downloads: 148
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Controversies over the status of the state and Kingdom of SCS
Secondary abstract: The article aims mainly at analyzing the issue of legal (dis)continuity between the Kingdom of Serbia and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (hereinafter the Kingdom of SCS) within the context of an international dispute between Germany and the Kingdom of SCS, and to revealing the reasons for different court decisions interpretations in a particular case. By using the techniques of historical-legal and analytical methods in researching into documents and secondary opinions given by politicians and constitutional lawyers, the paper first gives a brief overview of international circumstances that enabled the post-war states formation. It also summarizes different opinions regarding the legal status of the State of SCS and the character of the First-December Act taking into account historical and modern international and constitutional criteria. The conclusion is made in the context of discussion regarding the central issue that Ivan Žolger’s interpretation that despite the verdict in the particular case, the Kingdom of SCS was a new state, since it was not created in accordance with the 1903 Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbia. In addition to the argument that the State of SCS met the basic criteria of statehood, and that the formation of the Kingdom of SCS interrupted the constitutional continuity of the Kingdom of Serbia, the contribution of the paper lies in the argument that different legal opinions were not so much the result of legal ambiguities, but primarily a reflection of one, out of many, political battles fought between the conflicting state ideologies.
Secondary keywords: Kingdom of SCS;status;constitutions;history;
Type (COBISS): Article
Pages: str. 9-31
Volume: ǂGod. ǂ36
Issue: ǂbr. ǂ3-4
Chronology: 2020
ID: 12410068