(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Lina Atelj (Author), Samo Bardutzky (Mentor)

Abstract

Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika (SZVP) predstavlja del celovitega pravnega reda Unije, a hkrati ohranja poseben položaj. Kar jo loči od preostalih politik Evropske Unije je izrazita medvladna narava njenega delovanja. Ena izmed njenih posebnih lastnosti je tudi izključitev pristojnosti Sodišča Evropske unije (SEU) na tem področju. Po tem, ko je Lizbonska pogodba predvidela omejen sodni nadzor nad SZVP, je SEU skozi sodno prakso širilo obseg svoje pristojnosti in postopoma prispevalo k integraciji te politike v enoten evropski pravni sistem. Čeprav je ta razvoj izboljšal nivo varstva temeljnih pravic znotraj Unije, vrzeli v sistemu pravnega varstva vseeno ostajajo. S tem ko evropsko zunanje delovanje postaja vse bolj kompleksno, se v luči načela pravne države pojavlja dvom o opravičljivosti imunitete SZVP pred sodnim nadzorom. Pri zapolnjevanju vrzeli se ponujajo različne rešitve, ki imajo svoje prednosti in slabosti, vendar pa bo sistem pravnega varstva celovit le, ko bodo snovalci Pogodb tudi formalno pristali na poln sodni nadzor SZVP. Do takrat bo moralo SEU s pomočjo temeljnih pravnih načel še naprej utemeljevati obseg svoje pristojnosti na tem politično občutljivem področju.

Keywords

skupna zunanja in varnostna politika;pristojnost Sodišča Evropske unije;pravo zunanjih odnosov EU;pravica do sodne presoje;ustavnosodni nadzor;zunanja politika;varnostna politika;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [L. Atelj]
UDC: 342:061.1EU(043.2)
COBISS: 62809859 Link will open in a new window
Views: 365
Downloads: 86
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Constitutional Review of the EU's Common foreign and Security Policy
Secondary abstract: The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) forms part of the integrated legal order of the European Union but remains in many ways special. What differentiates the CFSP from other areas of EU law and policy is that its nature remains distinctly intergovernmental. One of its special features is that in principle, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in this field is excluded. After the Lisbon Treaty introduced a limited possibility of the CJEU to exercise judicial control over CFSP, the caselaw has been progressively extending the scope of the Court's jurisdiction and adopted an integrationist approach towards CFSP. These developments have improved the level of the protection of fundamental rights in the European Union, however the gaps in judicial review remain. While the EU’s external action is becoming ever more complex, its immunity from judicial review is becoming questionable from the perspective of the rule of law. When addressing these gaps, different mechanisms for ensuring the accountability of CFSP have been considered. Until the evolving political circumstances result in constitutional amendments allowing a full judicial review of the CFSP, the CJEU will have to further specify and justify the exact limits of its jurisdiction using fundamental legal principles in this politically sensitive field.
Secondary keywords: common foreign and security policy;Court of Justice jurisdiction;EU external relations law;right to judicial review;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: VI, 42 f.
ID: 12855946