moč argumenta ali argument moči?
Abstract
V središču zanimanja tega prispevka so testi, tako jezikovni kot drugi testi znanja, v katerih se uporabljajo besedila in se ob njih postavljajo (verbalna)vprašanja. Jezikovno in vsakršno testiranje odpira številna strokovna in etična vprašanja, med drugim tudi to, ali je mogoče sestavljati teste, ne da bi hkrati razmišljali tudi o zapletenih procesih razumevanja. Na seminarskem tečaju bomo na konkretnih primerih ugotavljali, katere so dobre in slabe lastnosti nalog in vprašanj v testih, kakšne so strokovne zahteve sodobnega (jezikovnega) testiranja, katera etična načela bi morali pri tem upoštevati in zakaj. Čeprav bo naše razmišljanje usmerjala predpostavka, da se testi večinoma uporabljajo kot argument moči, pa bomo hkrati iskali tudi možne rešitve za to, da bi lahko pridobili (tudi) moč argumenta.
Keywords
testiranje znanja;razumevanje;razumljivost;pravičnost;etika;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2013 |
Typology: |
1.08 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution |
Organization: |
UL FF - Faculty of Arts |
UDC: |
17:371.26 |
COBISS: |
52294242
|
Views: |
244 |
Downloads: |
31 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
This contribution focuses on tests - language and other kinds - in which texts are used and (verbal) questions posed. Language tests and others raise a number of professional and ethical questions, including whether it is possible to create tests without also considering the complex processes of understanding. On a seminar course we shall look at specific tests in order to identify the good and bad qualities of tasks and questions in tests, what are the professional demands of contemporary (language) testing, and which ethical principles should be taken into account and why. Although our discussion will be guided by the assumption that tests usually represent an argument of power, we shall also seek possible ways in which they could be supported by the power of argument. |
Secondary keywords: |
z;testing knowledge;comprehension;comprehensibility;fairness;ethics; |
Pages: |
Str. 99-105 |
ID: |
13032316 |