diplomska naloga visokošolskega strokovnega študijskega programa prve stopnje
Abstract
Supervizija v psihoterapevtski oziroma svetovalni stroki je nujen in obvezen del, ki zagotavlja
strokovnost in etičnost psihoterapevtskega procesa, razvoj kompetenc udeleženih in hkrati
predstavlja način tešitve strokovnih potreb psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev. Zato je v praksi
izjemno pomembno, da so do kakovostne supervizije upravičeni vsi supervizorji/svetovalci, da
je vsem omogočena in dosegljiva ter da se je redno poslužujejo.
V diplomski nalogi raziskujemo odnos psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev do supervizije. Izhajali
smo iz petih postavljenih hipotez, s pomočjo katerih ugotavljamo, ali se večina
psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev redno poslužuje supervizije, ali večina
psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev pozitivno doživlja izkušnjo supervizije, ali se v večjem odstotku
supervizije poslužujejo mlajši psihoterapevti/svetovalci, ali jim je pomembno in preverjajo
primernost in strokovnost supervizorja ter ali lahko supervizija zadosti skoraj vse strokovne
potrebe psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev. V teoretičnem delu razčlenimo in opredelimo supervizijo
kot proces, opredelimo vlogo in naloge supervizorja in supervizanta ter opišemo supervizijski
odnos in vse, kar le-ta v sebi nosi. V empiričnem delu s pomočjo kvantitativne metode oz.
izvedene ankete raziskujemo odnos psihoterapevtov/svetovalcev do supervizije in ugotavljamo,
na kakšen način se ta odnos izraža/manifetsira, s pomočjo kvalitativnega pristopa in izvedenega
intervjuja pa raziskujemo globine supervizijskega odnosa ter notranjega sveta supervizorja in
supervizanta. Z intervjuvanko tudi pokomentiramo in interpretiramo pridobljene rezultate
ankete in postavljene hipoteze.
Keywords
supervizija;supervizor;psihoterapevti;svetovanje;psihoterapija;diplomske naloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2017 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
FUDŠ - School of advanced social studies |
Publisher: |
[T. Ravnikar] |
UDC: |
615.851 |
COBISS: |
1024778305
|
Views: |
1 |
Downloads: |
2 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
Supervision is an essential and obligatory component of the psychotherapeutic and counseling
professions. It ensures that the psychotherapeutic process is professional and ethical and
develops the competence of the participants involved. At the same time, supervision provides a
means of meeting the professional requirements of psychotherapists/ counselors. It is therefore
of vital importance in practice that all psychotherapists/ counselors are entitled to quality
supervision, that it is made possible for and accessible to all and that it is regularly utilized.
This thesis researches the attitudes of psychotherapists/ counselors towards supervision and
derives from five hypotheses which will help to answer the following questions: Do most
psychotherapists/ counselors regularly make use of supervision? Do most psychotherapists/
counselors have a positive experience of supervision? Is there a higher percentage of young
psychotherapists/ counselors who make use of supervision? Is supervision important to
psychotherapists/ counselors and do they verify the adequacy and professionalism of the
supervisor? Can supervision satisfy nearly all the professional requirements of
psychotherapists/ counselors? The theoretical section analyses and defines supervision as a
process, defines the roles and tasks of supervisors and supervisees and defines the supervisory
relationship and all that comes with it. The empirical section makes use of quantitative methods,
namely survey findings, to research the attitudes of psychotherapists/ counselors towards
supervision. It also determines in what manner this relationship expresses/ manifests itself.
Finally, utilizing the qualitative approach and conducted interviews, this section researches the
depths of the supervisory relationship and the inner worlds of the supervisor and supervisee.
The obtained survey results and hypotheses are also commented on and interpreted with input
from the interviewee. |
Type (COBISS): |
Bachelor thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Fak. za uporabne družbene študije v Novi Gorici |
Pages: |
89 str., [21] str. pril. |
ID: |
13184837 |