magistrsko delo
Ana Zidanšek (Author), Miroslav Žaberl (Mentor)

Abstract

V magistrskem delu so obravnavani prikriti preiskovalni ukrepi. Rdeča nit pričajočega dela so ukrepi, ki pomenijo navidezno storitev kaznivega dejanja in so navedeni v 155. členu Zakona o kazenskem postopku. V boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, ki predstavlja najhujšo obliko kaznivih dejanj, mora policija uporabiti posebne ukrepe, da bi ta kazniva dejanja odkrila in jih omejila. Problematika ukrepov 155. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku se kaže v tem, da predstavljajo moralno – etično dopustnost izvajanja kaznivih dejanja s strani predstavnikov države. Policija mora delovati zakonito in legitimno in ne sme na kakršenkoli način osebo napeljati , da bi izvršila kaznivo dejanje, to bi pomenilo, da država sodeluje pri izvrševanju kaznivega dejanja. Sodišče je tisto, ki ugotavlja ali je pri izvajanju ukrepov prišlo do policijske provokacije oziroma entrapmenta. Na podlagi subjektivno – objektivnega testa, ki ga je slovenska zakonodaja povzela po ameriški zakonodaji, mora presojati ali je bil storilec napeljan k izvršitvi kaznivega dejanja. Če sodišče ugotovi, da je bila izzvana kriminalna dejavnost, je to okoliščina, ki izključuje kazenski pregon za kaznivo dejane, ki je bilo storjeno na podlagi prikritih policijskih ukrepov. Zakonska ureditev omenjenih ukrepov bi morala biti bolj specifična v delih kjer se nanaša na policijsko provokacijo in napeljevanje, predvsem bi moral biti opredeljena definicija policijske provokacije. Ker je bilo ameriško sodišče prvo, ki je uporabilo entrapment obrambo, zajema pričajoče delo tudi analizo med slovenskimi in ameriškimi sodbami Vrhovnih sodišč. Primerjava daje vpogled v dojemanje policijske provokacije obeh sodišč.

Keywords

policija;preiskovanje;prikriti preiskovalni ukrepi;napeljevanje;navidezna storitev kaznivega dejanja;človekove pravice;sodna praksa;magistrska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher: [A. Zidanšek]
UDC: 343.1:351.741(043.2)
COBISS: 82802435 Link will open in a new window
Views: 333
Downloads: 37
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Normative regularity of undercover investigative measures which mean a commission of an apparent criminal offense
Secondary abstract: The master's thesis deals with covert investigative measures. The red thread of the present thesis is measures that constitute a fictitious commission of a criminal offense and are listed in Article 155 of the Criminal Procedure Act. In the fight against organized crime which is the worst form of a criminal offense, the police must take special measures to detect and limit these criminal offenses. The issues of the measures of Article 155 of the Criminal Procedure Act are reflected in the fact that they represent the moral and ethical admissibility of the commission of criminal offenses by representatives of the state. The police must act lawfully and legitimately and must not induce a person to commit a crime in any way. This would mean that the state is involved in the commission of the crime. It is the court that determines whether a police provocation or entrapment occurred during the implementation of the measures. Based on a subjective-objective test which was adopted by the Slovenian legislation from the American legislation, the court must assess whether the perpetrator was induced to commit a criminal offense. If the court determines that criminal activity has been provoked, this is a circumstance that precludes prosecution for a crime committed based on covert police measures. The legal regulation of the mentioned measures should be more specific in the parts where it refers to police provocation and instigation. Above all, the definition of police provocation should be defined. Because the American court was the first to use entrapment defense, the present thesis also includes an analysis between Slovenian and American Supreme Courts’ judgments. The comparison provides insight into the perception of police provocation by both courts.
Secondary keywords: covert investigative measures;instigation;police provocation;human rights;case law;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages: VII f., 76 str.
ID: 13587565