diplomsko delo
Andraž Trplan (Author), Simona Zavratnik Zimic (Mentor)

Abstract

Rasizem je po svojem »izgonu« iz javnega življenja po drugi svetovni vojni transformiral svojo obliko in pod pretvezo »dobrega nacionalizma« ter spoštovanja raznolikosti kultur doživel ponoven vzpon. Tokrat v navidezno bolj benigni obliki je novi rasizem (oz. neorasizem ali kulturni rasizem) ter pripadajoč neorasistični in populistični diskurz v zadnjih desetletjih postal del napredujočih radikalnih nacionalističnih politik in gibanj. V prvem delu diplomskega dela je obravnavana distinkcija med rasizmom in neorasizmom, predstavljene so njegove značilnosti, različnih teoretični pristopi in vsaj delna nezmožnost antirasizma pri obravnavi tega novega problema. Obravnavan je tudi populizem in njegovi diskurzivni pristopi. V empiričnem delu predstavim značilnosti in specifike neorasističnega in populističnega diskurza na primerih strank SDS in NSi ter predpostavim kritično diskurzivno analizo kot metodološki okvir za študijo primera – gibanje Generacija identitete. Pri opravljeni raziskavi so bile ugotovljene specifike in značilnosti neorasističnega in populističnega diskurza; prepletanje strategij polarizacije (mi – drugi), »grešnega kozla« (scapegoat), diskurza grožnje oz. strahu, samoviktimizacijskega diskurza, tipičnega neorasističnega diskurza »etnopluralnosti« in celo elementov eksplicitnega rasističnega diskurza.

Keywords

neorasizem;populizem;diskurz;Diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: [A. Trplan]
UDC: 323.14:81'42(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS: 88740099 Link will open in a new window
Views: 283
Downloads: 66
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Neo-racism and the rise of populism in Slovenia
Secondary abstract: After it’s expulsion from the society at the end of the World War II, racism has transformed itself and began to see a renewed rise under the pretense of a ‘good patriot’ and respect for diversity. This time in the more benign shape, new racism (or neo-racism, cultural racism) with it’s complementing neo-racist and populist discourse, has been implemented into the agenda of nationalist movements and political parties, that have been on a steep rise in popularity. The first part of my thesis includes a distinction between racism and neo-racism, characteristics of the new racism, its various theoretical frameworks and its at least partial inability to address the new arising issue. I also analyse populism and its many discourse approaches. In the empirical part, through the analysis of the two previous researches of Slovenian democratic party (SDS) and New Slovenija (NSi), I present the characteristics and specifics of neo-racist and populist discourse. I also exhibit the methodological frame for my case study - Slovenian Identity movement. The research results highlighted some of the specifics of the neo-racist and populist discourse; the interplay of polarisation strategies (us-others), ‘scapegoat’ and threat discourse. Victimhood and usual ‘ethnopluralist’ discourses are also presented with some elements of explicit racist discourse.
Secondary keywords: neo-racism;populism;discourse;Rasizem;Racism;Politične stranke;Political parties;Analiza diskurza;Discourse analysis;Slovenija;Slovenia;Graduate theses;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages: 39 str.
ID: 13708080