diplomsko delo
Maja Turk (Author), Aljoša Pužar (Mentor)

Abstract

V diplomskem delu sem s pomočjo gostobesednega opisa in kritične diskurzivne analize medijskih besedil poskušala dokazati, zakaj večji del Slovencev ostaja v odnosu do cepiv proti bolezni Covid-19 skeptičen. Analiza je osredotočena na makrosociološki pristop, ki preučuje diskurz v odnosu do ideologije, hegemonije in oblasti. Diskurz biopolitike je zaslužen, da med skeptiki v Sloveniji vladajo kritična nota, preizpraševanje vsega, česar se je Covid-19 polastil, ter nezaupanje v odnosu do stroke in političnih odločevalcev. Elementi biopolitike se kažejo skozi krizno upravljanje in vodenje, stigmo necepljenih posameznikov, segregacijo, panoptizem, opozicijo med sprejetimi ukrepi in učinki, prisotnostjo vedno novih različic virusa, odločbo, v kateri so ugotovljene in potrjene neskladnosti ukrepov z Ustavo Republike Slovenije, poročilo, v katerem so predstavljeni ambasadorji cepljenja, njihove naloge in scenariji nagovarjanja k cepljenju vseh starostnih skupin, (ne)transparentnost stroke in oblasti do javnosti in kapitalizma, ki se je polastil vseh vidikov življenja, tudi medicinskega. V raziskavi sem skušala dokazati, čemu je diskurz biopolitike v kontekstu cepiv proti bolezni Covid-19 prisoten.

Keywords

biopolitika;cepljeni;proticepilci;Diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: [M. Turk]
UDC: 316.64:606.4:615.371(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS: 88741891 Link will open in a new window
Views: 204
Downloads: 46
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Biopolitical Discourse Related to New Coronavirus Vaccines
Secondary abstract: In this paper, I provide an extensive description and a critical discursive analysis of texts disseminated by the media in an attempt to determine why the majority of Slovenes are sceptical about COVID-19 vaccines. The analysis focuses on the macrosocial approach, which examines the relationship between discourse on one side and ideology, hegemony, and authority on the other. Biopolitical discourse is the reason why sceptics in Slovenia remain critical, question everything related to COVID-19, and distrust specialists and decision-making authorities. Biopolitical elements can be perceived in crisis management, stigmatization of the unvaccinated, segregation, panopticism, opposition between the adopted measures and results, emergence of newer versions of the virus, a decree determining and confirming the non-compliance of adopted measures with the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, a report presenting vaccination ambassadors, their tasks, and ways of promoting vaccination among all age groups, (non-)transparency of specialists and authorities towards the public, and capitalism, which can be detected in all areas of life, including medicine. In this study, I tried to determine the reason behind the use of biopolitical discourse in the context of COVID-19 vaccines.
Secondary keywords: biopolitics;the vaccinated;anti-vaxxers;Covid-19;Cepiva;Vaccines;Stališče (psihologija);Attitude (Psychology);Slovenija;Slovenia;Graduate theses;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages: 44 str.
ID: 13729675
Recommended works:
, diplomsko delo
, ǂan ǂENDA/EAACI position paper
, primer dnevnika Delo v letih 2015 in 2016