diplomsko delo
Abstract
Umetna prekinitev nosečnosti je še vedno zelo delikatna, kontroverzna in sporna tema, čeprav se v življenju s splavom sreča večina žensk. Je predmet burnih razprav med nasprotniki in zagovorniki. Dostop do splava tehta pravice ploda proti pravicam matere. Kljub temu da večina držav razvitega sveta stremi k izboljšanju položaja žensk in njihovih reproduktivnih pravic ter s tem enakopravnosti med spoloma, so države, ki s spreminjanjem že tako restriktivne zakonodaje nazadujejo. Tak primer je Republika Poljska. Kljub temu da je bil ob njenem vstopu v EU pogoj liberalizacija zakonodaje glede človekovih pravic, predvsem umetne prekinitve nosečnosti, se je le-ta odločila zakonodajo še bolj zaostriti. Diplomska naloga je osredotočena predvsem na dogajanje ob koncu leta 2020 in v začetku leta 2021, ko je poljsko ustavno sodišče spremenilo pogoje za umetno prekinitev nosečnosti. Ta je sedaj dovoljena le v primeru, da je v nevarnosti življenje in zdravje matere ter če je nosečnost posledica kaznivega dejanja posilstva ali incesta. Ena izmed tem je tudi kako slovenska pravna ureditev ureja umetno prekinitev nosečnosti, ter primerjava s precej manj obširno poljsko ureditvijo. Kljub trenutni pravni ureditvi na Poljskem je imela le-ta skozi svojo zgodovino precej raznolike poglede na splav. Zanimivo je to, da je bil v času komunizma splav dostopnejši kot v času demokracije, kar pa je verjetno posledica vpetosti Katoliške Cerkve v politično sfero
Keywords
umetna prekinitev nosečnosti;Slovenija;Poljska;restriktivna zakonodaja;liberalna zakonodaja;splav;protesti;pro-choice;pro-life;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2021 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica |
Publisher: |
[K. Sajevic] |
UDC: |
347.191.11(043.2) |
COBISS: |
92580099
|
Views: |
3 |
Downloads: |
2 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
Artificial termination of pregnancy is still to this day a very delicate and controversial topic of discussion, even though most women encounter it at least once in their lifetime. It is the subject of heated debates between opponents of abortion and proponents of abortion. Access to abortion weighs on the rights of the fetus and the rights of the mother. Despite the fact that most countries in the developed part of the world strive to improve the situation of women and their reproductive rights, and thus gender equality, there are countries that are regressing by changing their already restrictive legislation on abortion. One such example is Republic of Poland. Despite the fact that the liberalizations of human rights legislation, especially abortion, was a condition for its accession to the EU, it decided to tighten the legislation even more The dissertation focuses mainly on events at the end of 2020 and the beginning of 2021, when the Polish Constituional Court changed the conditions of abortion, which is now only allowed if the life and health of the mother are at risk or in danger and if the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest. One of the topics is also how the Slovenian legal regulation regulates abortion, and a comparison with a much less extensive Polish regulation. Despite the current jurisdiction in Poland, it has had quite diverse views on abortion throughout its history. Interestingly, abortion was more accessible during the communist regime than it is in democracy, which is probably due to the Catholic's Church involvement in the political sphere |
Type (COBISS): |
Final reflection paper |
Thesis comment: |
Evropska pravna fak. |
Source comment: |
Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Nasl. z nasl. zaslona;
Opis vira z dne 8. 1. 2022;
|
Pages: |
1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (45 str.)) |
ID: |
14196051 |