magistrsko delo
Tomaž Pahulje (Author), Andrej Anžič (Mentor)

Abstract

Prekrškovno pravo je z uveljavitvijo ZP-1 v letu 2005 postalo nova paradigma pri vodenju in odločanju v tovrstnih postopkih. Upravni in drugi državni organi ter nosilci javnih pooblastil so postali prekrškovni organi in so v okviru svojih pristojnosti odločali o prekrških v hitrem postopku. Petnajst let implementacije določb ZP-1 je zaznamovalo več perspektiv, ki so posredno in neposredno vplivale na prekrškovni postopek. V magistrskem delu bomo preučevali dve perspektivi, ki sta po našem mnenju imeli vpliv predvsem na hitri prekrškovni postopek. Prva perspektiva se nanaša spremembe normativne ureditve določb ZP-1, ki jih je bilo v petnajstih letih kar deset. Preučevanje teh sprememb bomo analizirali z vidika vpliva normativne zakonodaje ZP-1 na postopke o prekršku z vidika pravic procesnih udeležencev (kršiteljev). V drugi perspektivi pa bo preučevanje osredotočeno na vpliv sodne prakse ESČP in slovenskih sodišč na normativno ureditev. Skozi posamezne primere sodne prakse bomo ugotavljali in ocenjevali korelacijo med sodno prakso in njen vpliv na določbe ZP-1. Na podlagi obiska Sodišča okrožja v Viechtachu in policijske postaje bo s primerjalno pravnega vidika opravljena primerjava obravnave prekrškov v Nemčiji (Bavarski model). S kvantificiranim (številčnim) prikazom bo predstavljen pregled prekrškovnih postopkov v policiji od 2005 do 2015 in ločeno po letu 2015. V zaključnih ugotovitvah bo opravljena verifikacija izpostavljene hipoteze, prispevek k znanosti oziroma stroki ter aplikativna vrednost magistrskega dela.

Keywords

prekrškovni postopek;prekrškovno pravo;prekrškovni organi;policija;sodna praksa;spoštovanje človekovih pravic;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica
Publisher: [T. Pahulje]
UDC: 343:351.74(043.2)
COBISS: 96044803 Link will open in a new window
Views: 4
Downloads: 1
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: With enforcement of the Misdemeanour Act (ZP-1) in the year of 2005, the misdemeanour law had become a new paradigm in the misdemeanour procedure management and reaching decisions in particular cases. Administrative and other state authorities and holders of public authorization had become misdemeanour authorities. In frame of their authority, they had decided about the offences in the quick misdemeanour procedure. In 15 years of implementing provisions for ZP-1, there were many perspectives, which had an indirect and direct impact on misdemeanour procedure. In this master thesis, I will study two perspectives, which in my opinion had an impact, predominantly on quick misdemeanour procedure. The first perspective relates to the changes of normative provisions of ZP-1. There were 10 of them within the last 15 years. I will analyse those changes from the influence of normative legislation of ZP-1 point of view. I will address the aspect of misdemeanour procedures and the rights of the participants’ point of view (violators/offenders). In the second perspective, the thesis will focus on the influence of legal practice of the European Court of Human Rights and Slovenian courts on normative regulation. Through the individual cases of legal practice, I will determine and assess the correlation between legal practice and its influence on provisions of ZP-1. Based on the visit of the District court and the Police Station in Viechtach, I will conduct the comparative legal assessment of misdemeanours in Germany (Bavarian model). With quantitative (numerical) display, I will present the review of misdemeanour procedures in the Police from the year 2005 up until 2015, as well as for the period after the year 2015. In my final findings, there is going to be a verification of exposed hypothesis, a contribution to science / profession along with the applicative value of master thesis.
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Evropska pravna fak.
Source comment: Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 2. 2. 2022;
Pages: 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (110 str.))
ID: 14444589