magistrsko delo
Nina Zupanič (Author), Boštjan Bajec (Mentor)

Abstract

Ker v znanosti ni enotnega sistema klasifikacije timskih vlog, v slovenskem okolju pa nimamo veliko vprašalnikov, je bil poglaviten namen raziskave preveriti ustreznost modela timskih vlog po avtorjih Driskell, Driskell, Burke in Salas (2017) ter sestava vprašalnika po njih. Model zajema trinajst timskih vlog, ki so razporejene po tridimenzionalnem prostoru glede na sledeče dimenzije: dominantnost, družabnost in usmerjenost na nalogo. V vzorec je bilo zajetih 543 udeležencev (129 moških in 412 žensk), ki so izpolnili vprašalnik osebnostnih lastnosti (BFI) in na novo razvit Vprašalnik timskih vlog. Ustreznost modela, ki se je preverjal s konfirmatorno faktorsko analizo, je bila slaba. Za namen izboljšanja mer prileganja so se v raziskavi uporabili modifikacisjki indeksi. Vzorec je bil zato razdeljen na dva dela. Na prvem se je izvajala analiza modifikacisjkih indeksov, na drugem sem poskušala model potrditi. Model s trinajstimi vlogami se ni potrdil, vendar se je približal priporočljivim mejam dobrega prileganja. Zato so bile preverjene vloge kot ločeni konstrukti. S pomočjo modifikacijskih indeksov so se mere prileganja pri določenih vlogah izboljšale. Zanesljivost je bila ustrezna. Nekaj deviacije od teorije se je pokazalo pri preverjanju korelacij med vlogami in regresije med osebnostnimi potezami ter vlogami, kar bi lahko nakazovalo na slabšo teoretično zasnovo. Struktura modela se je preverila še z eksploratorno faktorsko analizo, kjer se model s trinajstimi vlogami ni potrdil. Na koncu so podane ideje in vprašanja za razvoja novega modela timskih vlog.

Keywords

timske vloge;timi;Vprašalnik timskih vlog VTV;sestava testa;merske značilnosti;magistrska dela;Vprašalnik velikih pet faktorjev BFI;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher: [N. Zupanič]
UDC: 159.9.072:316.45(043.2)
COBISS: 99657731 Link will open in a new window
Views: 202
Downloads: 50
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Development of a Team Roles Questionnaire
Secondary abstract: Since there is no unified classification system of team roles in science and there are not many questionnaires in the Slovenian environment, the main purpose of the research was to evaulate the adequacy of the Team Roles model by Driskell, Driskell, Burke and Salas (2017) and development of a questionnaire. The model comprises thirteen team roles, which are distributed across three-dimensional space according to the following dimensions: dominance, sociability and task orientation. The sample consisted of 543 participants (129 men and 412 women) who completed the Big Five Inventory Questionnaire (BFI) and the newly developed Team Roles Questionnaire. Model fit, which was tested by confirmatory factor analysis, was not adequate. In order to improve the goodnes of fit indices of a model, the study used modification indices. The sample was therefore split into two parts. The first part was used for modification indices analysis and the second part was used for model validation. The model with thirteen roles was not confirmed but approached the recommended goodness of fit indices. Therefore, the roles were tested as separate constructs. The modification indices improved the goodness of fit measures for some roles. Reliability was adequate. Some deviation from theory was found when testing for correlations between team roles and regression between personality traits and team roles, which could indicate a weaker theoretical design. The structure of the model was further tested by exploratory factor analysis, where the model with thirteen roles was not confirmed. Finally, ideas and questions for the development of a new team role model are given.
Secondary keywords: team roles;teams;Team roles questionnaire;test construction;metric characteristics;masters theses;Big five inventory BFI;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za psihologijo
Pages: 116 str.
ID: 14570390