Govor Črnomlja

magistrsko delo

Katarina Špringer (Author), Vera Smole (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko delo obravnava govor Črnomlja, ki spada v dolenjsko narečno skupino, znotraj nje pa v severnobelokranjsko narečje. V teoretičnem delu sem na kratko opisala zgodovinske okoliščine, ki so vplivale na spremembe v narečnem govoru na območju Bele krajine; pogoste stereotipe o narečjih ter razloge za spreminjanje narečij. Navedla sem strnjen zgodovinski opis nastanka slovenskih narečij in se osredotočila na že narejene raziskave o belokranjskih govorih. V empiričnem delu sem opisala potek zbiranja in obdelave gradiva. Govorce sem razvrstila v 3 starostne skupine, pri vsakem naredila transkripcijo zvočnega posnetka njegovega govora, diahrono analizo le-tega (s poudarkom na glasoslovno-naglasnih prvinah) in komentar k analizi. Na podlagi narejene analize sem določila glasovne spremenljivke in njihove različice ter jih navedla v tabelnem prikazu. To je bilo izhodišče za primerjavo posameznih govorcev znotraj iste starostne skupine in posplošitev najpogostejših značilnosti v njihovih govorih. Na koncu sem na osnovi zbranih ugotovitev naredila še primerjavo vseh treh starostnih skupin govorcev črnomaljskega govora, pri čemer sem bila posebej pozorna na spremembe, ki počasi vodijo v smeri od narečnega k nastanku nadnarečja. Izpostavila sem narečne značilnosti, ki jih mladi govorci še vedno ohranjajo oz. še potencirajo, kar kaže na njihov pozitiven odnos do narečja.

Keywords

slovenščina;slovenska narečja;severnobelokranjsko narečje;črnomaljski govor;narečjeslovje;Črnomelj;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2022
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher:	[K. Špringer]
UDC:	811.163.6'282.3(497.434Črnomelj)
COBISS:	102327043
Views:	212
Downloads:	90
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Črnomelj speech
Secondary abstract:	My master's thesis focuses on the speech of the town of Črnomelj, which is a part of Dolenjska (Lower Carniola) dialect group, and northern Bela krajina (Nothern White Carniola) dialect. The theoretic part includes a brief description of historical conditions, which influenced the changes in the dialect in the area of Bela krajina; common stereotypes related to dialects, and reasons for the changes of dialects. There is a concise historical description of the origin of Slovenian dialects with the focus on the previous research on Bela krajina speech. In the empirical part of the thesis, there is a description of the method of collecting and handling the material. The speakers are divided in three age groups which are accompanied by transcripts of all audio recordings and diachronic analysis (with the emphasis on phonetics and accent elements), and followed by their analysis and comments. Based on the analysis, the vocal variable and their variants were determined, and presented in a table, which enabled a comparison of individual speakers within their age group, and consequently generalize the most common characteristics in their speech. According to my findings, I made a comparison between the speakers of all three age groups, mainly focusing on the changes, which slowly lead a dialect to form into a subdialect. I have also exposed dialect characteristics still used or even accentuated by young speakers, which shows their positive attitude to their dialect.
Secondary keywords:	Slovenian language;Slovenian dialects;dialect of northern Bela krajina (White Carniola dialect);Črnomelj speech;dialectology;Črnomelj;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za slovenistiko
Pages:	204 str.
ID:	14594476