Postmoderno prostorsko planiranje
Abstract
Kriza prostorskega planiranja je za nekatere logična posledica prehoda iz moderne v postmoderno družbo. V novih pogojih je težko izvajati hierarhizirano formalno sistemsko družbeno regulacijo, ker je ena temeljnih značilnosti postmoderne individualizirana raznovrstnost, ki prinaša nestabilnost in nepredvidljivost. Toge formalne procedure zato težko dosegajo legitimnost. Razprava pritrjuje tezam, da je vseobsežno prostorsko planiranje neperspektivno in neuresničljivo. Vendar pa to ne pomeni, da prostorsko planiranje ni več potrebno in aktualno. V sklepu razprave je poudarjeno, da semora prostorsko planiranje odpreti, demokratizirati in preobraziti v odprto "soodločevalsko" planiranje. Takšno "postmoderno" planiranje je operativno in obenem sposobno dosegati legitimnost.
Keywords
postmoderna;legitimnost;odločanje;Prostorsko planiranje;
Data
| Language: | Slovenian |
|---|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2003 |
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
| Organization: | UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences |
| UDC: | 71/72 |
| COBISS: |
22298717
|
| ISSN: | 0040-3598 |
| Parent publication: | Teorija in praksa |
| Views: | 1117 |
| Downloads: | 148 |
| Average score: | 0 (0 votes) |
| Metadata: |
|
Other data
| Secondary language: | English |
|---|---|
| Secondary abstract: | Some see the crisis of spatial planning as a logical consequence of transitionfrom modernity to posmodern society. In the new conditions, the hierarchic formal systemic social regulation becomes difficult to carry out because of the basic feature of the postmodernity - an individualised plurality, which brings instability and unpredictability. Rigid formal procedures thus hardly reach legitimacy. The debate confirms the ideas that all embracing spatial planning does not have the future and is not feasible. However, this does not mean that spatial planning is not topical and necessary. The author concludes that the spatial planning must open up, it hasto democratise and transform into an open planning. Such 'postmodern' planning is operative and at the same time able to reach legitimacy. |
| Secondary keywords: | postmodernity;legitimity;decision-making;Spatial planning; |
| Type (COBISS): | Not categorized |
| Pages: | str. 647-657 |
| Volume: | ǂLetn. ǂ40 |
| Issue: | ǂšt. ǂ4 |
| Chronology: | julij/avgust 2003 |
| Keywords (UDC): | the arts;recreation;entertainment;sport;umetnost;razvedrilo;zabava;šport;physical planning;regional;town and country planning;landscapes;parks;gardens;urejanje prostora;urejanje pokrajin;mest in podeželja;pokrajine;parki;vrtovi; |
| ID: | 1467354 |
Recommended works:
Postmoderno prostorsko planiranje
2003,
no subtitle data available
Revitalizacija Trbovelj
2008,
problematika odnosa med rudnikom Trbovlje-Hrastnik in občino Trbovlje
Zdravko Mlinar (ur.): Local development and socio-spatial organization. Trend, problems and polices
2002,
the case of Koper, Slovenia. Local government and public service reform initiative. Open society institute, Budapest 2000
Mesto in urbanizem med teorijo in prakso
2004,
no subtitle data available
Prostor za vsakdanjo rabo
2009,
širimo znanje za sodelovanje pri urejanju prostora