Teorija hegemonske stabilnosti

racionalnosti versus konstruktivisti

Abstract

Članek obravnava teorijo hegemonske stabilnosti kot problem kolektivne akcije v mednarodnih ekonomskih odnosih. V prvem delu obravnava pojme hegemonije, sodelovanja in institucionalizacije v mednarodnih odnosih. V tretjem poglavju se loteva integracije različnih racionalističnih pristopov k sodelovanju, ki temeljijo na racionalnem odločanju in situacijskem determinizmu. Četrto poglavje zajema konstruktivistično kritiko teh pristopov, ki nadomešča strateško interakcijo s komunikacijskim delovanjem, in se osredotoča na konstitutivna pravila (v nasprotju z regulativnimi pravili racionalizma) kot temelj institucionalizacije v mednarodnih odnosih. Peto poglavje predstavlja kritičen pristop do racionalističnega pojmovanja moči in hegemonije, ki temelji na Dahlovem pojmovanju moči in enačenju hegemonije s premočjo v resursih. Namesto tega se usmerja k družbenim vidikom moči in odnosu med močjo in znanjem.

Keywords

teorije;konstruktivizem;Mednarodni odnosi;Hegemonija;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2003
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	327
COBISS:	22299997
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	850
Downloads:	359
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The article addresses the theory of hegemonic stability as a problem of collective action in the international political economy. It begins by defining the concepts of hegemony, cooperation and institutionalisation in international relations. Chapter 3 attempts to integrate rationalist models ofcooperation, based on assumption of rational choice and situational determinism. The following chapter examines the constructivist critique of rationalist models of cooperation by introducing the concept of communicative action to replace strategic interaction of rationalism and consequently focuses on constitutive rules (contrary to regulative rules of rationalism) asthe foundation of institutionalisation in international relations. Chapter 5attempts to redefine the concept of power and hegemony. After rejecting Dahl's definition of power and related perspective on hegemony as preponderance of material resources, it adopts a notion of social power and focuses on relation between power and knowledge.
Secondary keywords:	theories;constructivism;International relations;Hegemony;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 706-723
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ40
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ4
Chronology:	julij/avgust 2003
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;politics;politika;politične vede;international relations;world;global politics;international affairs;foreign policy;mednarodni odnosi;svetovna politika;mednarodne zadeve;zunanja politika;
ID:	1467357