Spremljanje in vrednotenje kulturnih politik

mednarodno primerjalna analiza

Danica Fink-Hafner (Author), Simona Kustec Lipicer (Author)

Abstract

V prispevku se osredotočamo na analize in raziskave, ki so se razvile v prvi vrsti zaradi poseganja države na vse več področij družbenega življenja. Raba policy analize se s področja državotvornih resorjev vse bolj širi tudi na druga socialna področja, vključno s kulturnim. V prispevku analiziramo razvoj sistema spremljanja in vrednotenja kulturnih politik v Franciji, na Nizozemskem in Finskem. Mednarodno primerjalna analiza zajema institucionalne,vsebinske in metodološke značilnosti omenjenih sistemov. Glavni vir podatkov so številne že opravljene raziskave ter 23 družboslovnih intervjujev z vladnimi in civilnodružbenimi strokovnjaki (opravljeni v letu 2002), ki delujejo na področju kulturnih politik v teh državah. Primerjalna raziskava kaže, da so državni (politični) odločevalci privilegirani v procesihoblikovanja in izvajanja politik zaradi svojega monopolnega položaja in dostopnosti strokovnih podlag (policy analiz), vendar v demokratičnih družbah s krepitvijo civilno družbenega sektorja take analize vse bolj postajajo tudi orodje v procesu demokratizacije odločanja o vpletanju države vkulturo.

Keywords

Analiza politik;Kulturna politika;Vrednotenje;Javna politika;Francija;Finska;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2005
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	32
COBISS:	23850845
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	968
Downloads:	104
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The article focuses on analysis and research that has chiefly developed in response to the state's growing intervention in society. Reflecting the increasing need for expert support for political decision-making in policy processes, policy analysis as a new discipline developed in the second half oflast century. The use of policy analysis has been shifting from the core state sectors to others, including cultural policies. In the article, we analyse the development of systems for monitoring and evaluating cultural policies in France, the Netherlands and Finland on the basis of both previous research and 23 interviews conducted with governmental and nongovernmental experts in these countries in 2002. The institutional, contextual and methodological characteristics of these systems are compared. Research has shown that state actors (political decision-makers) are privileged due to their monopolistic positions and access to expert knowledge (policy analysis findings) in the policy process. Still, we are witnessing the strengthening ofthe civil society sector in democratic societies. This phenomenon is also expressed in the shrinking state monopoly in the mentioned systems. Policy analysis is becoming a tool of the democratisation of cultural policy-making. Through civil society actors' involvement in the monitoring and evaluating of cultural policies the state-centred systems of collecting primarily quantitative data for the needs of political executives are being altered by both the enrichment of sources and the methodological complexity of monitoringand evaluating cultural policies.
Secondary keywords:	Policy analysis;Cultural policy;Evaluation;Public policy;France;Nizozemska;Netherlands;Finland;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 212-238
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ42
Issue:	ǂno. ǂ1
Chronology:	jan./mar. 2005
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;politics;politika;politične vede;
ID:	1467870