Javnost med "novimi" mediji in "starimi" teorijami

Abstract

Po normativnih definicijah naj bi javnost (publiciteta) znatno prispevala k demokratični družbeni ureditvi, predvsem z legitimizacijo tiska in drugih medijev kot konstitutivnih dejavnikov javnosti in javnega mnenja. Kljub ogromnim tehnološkim in družbenim (predvsem ekonomskim) spremembam v obdobju globalizacije še vedno ostaja veljavnih veliko "starih" predpostavk o javnosti, javnem mnenju in javni sferi, kljub najnovejšim tehnološkim dosežkom v komuniciranju pa ostajajo nerazrešena tudi mnoga "stara" protislovja. Bistvena normativna značilnost javnih medijev, da lahko preoblikujejo partikularne interese v skupni interes s konfrontacijo vladajočih in vladanih ali s posredovanjem med njimi, pri internetu še vedno umanka - ne zaradi njegove tehnološke, ampak zaradi njegove družbene narave. Bolj kot nove interpretacije (nadnacionalne) javne sfere in javnega mnenja so potrebna prizadevanja, da bi ju spremenili v smeri, ki bi omogočila udejanjenje publicitete v njeni prvotni "tridimenzionalni zasnovi" kot osebne pravice do komuniciranja v javnosti, javnega nadzora vladanja (vladovanja) in mediacije med državo in civilno družbo.

Keywords

Javnost;Globalizacija;Množični mediji;Javno mnenje;Javna sfera;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2010
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher:	Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani
UDC:	32.019.51:316.77
COBISS:	29248605
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	583
Downloads:	128
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Publicity between 'new' media and 'old' theories
Secondary abstract:	Despite the enormous technological and social (especially economic) changes in the era of globalisation, many 'old' assumptions about the public, public opinion and the public sphere remain in force and, despite the latest technological developments in communication, many 'old' contradictions remain unresolved. The Internet has not succeeded in bringing into play the fundamental normative feature of public media - the conversion of particularistic interests into a common interest by confronting the rulers and the ruled, and mediating between them - not because of its technological nature, but because of its social nature. More than new interpretations of the (transnational) public sphere and public opinion, efforts are needed to change them in a direction that would enable the manifestation of publicity in its original 'three-dimensional design' as a personal right to communicate in public, surveillance of the public over government (governance), and mediation between the state and civil society.
Secondary keywords:	Public;Globalisation;Mass media;Public opinion;Public sphere;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 8-21
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ47
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology:	jan.-feb. 2010
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;politics;politika;politične vede;social sciences;družbene vede;sociology;sociologija;sociology of culture;cultural context of social life;sociologija kulture;
ID:	1470038