magistrsko delo
Tjaša Kovač (Author), Simona Prosen (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko delo obravnava povezavo med posameznikovimi obremenjujočimi izkušnjami v otroštvu (v nadaljevanju OIO) in odločitvijo za poklic pomoči. Vpliv in daljnosežni učinek OIO avtorji raziskujejo že od leta 1997, prva tovrstna slovenska študija pa je bila izvedena leta 2019. V teoretičnem uvodu so najprej predstavljeni koncepti prvotne in slovenske študije o OIO ter razlaga nekaterih pomislekov in kritik študij OIO. Sledi pregled relevantnih poklicnih teorij ter razmejitev notranjih in zunanjih motivov, za katere predpostavljamo, da podzavestno ali zavestno vplivajo na odločitev za poklic. Namen empirične raziskave je preveriti, ali obstajajo razlike med študentkami socialne pedagogike (v nadaljevanju SP) in študentkami farmacije pri motivih odločanja za svoj študij in razlike med njihovo oceno OIO. Magistrsko delo odkriva pojavnost OIO v posamezni skupini študentk ter korelacijo med oceno OIO in motivi izbire poklica. Nadalje to poglobimo pri izvajalcih poklicev pomoči, kjer nas zanima njihov pogled na odločitev za svoj poklic v povezavi z njihovo oceno OIO in soočanje s stresnimi situacijami v službi. Da bi proučevano problematiko bolje razumeli, smo uporabili kombiniran pristop s kvantitativno in kvalitativno metodologijo. Vzorec zajema skupno 152 študentk (81 študentk socialne pedagogike in 71 študentk farmacije) in pet strokovnih delavcev, ki delajo na področju procesnih (tri socialne pedagoginje) in kriznih (gasilec in reševalec) intervencij. Ugotovitve kažejo, da imajo študentke SP višjo oceno OIO, skupini študentk pa se razlikujeta tudi pri motivih, ki doprinesejo k njihovi odločitvi za poklic – študentke SP pripisujejo večjo pomembnost motivom, kot so družboslovna naravnanost, empatija, osebno zadovoljstvo, veselje do dela, doprinos družbi in težnja po skrbi za druge, študentke farmacije pa motivom: veselje do dela, naravoslovna naravnanost ter želja delati na sebi in pomagati družbi. Pozitivno povezavo med oceno OIO in notranjim motivom raziskovanja in reševanja svojih osebnih težav smo potrdili pri skupini študentk SP. Kot motive, pomembne pri odločitvi za poklic naših sogovornikov, smo zaznali pozitivne občutke (in povratno informacijo) ob nudenju pomoči, ambivalentno obliko navezanosti, izkušnje iz otroštva in mentorje v času odraščanja. Kot izredno pomembno pri soočanju s stresom pa smo poleg podpore kolektiva in dobrih odnosov zaznali še daljšo delovno dobo.

Keywords

obremenjujoče izkušnje;otroštvo;poklici pomoči;poklicna odločitev;procesne intervencije;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher: [T. Kovač]
UDC: 331.54:159.922.73(043.2)
COBISS: 107527939 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1
Downloads: 0
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Connection between adverse childhood experience and the decision for the helper career
Secondary abstract: This master's thesis studies the connection between an individual's adverse childhood experience (ACE) and the decision to pursue a helping career. Authors have been researching the impact of far-reaching effects of ACE since 1997 and the first Slovenian study of its kind was conducted in 2019. In the theoretical introduction the paper first presents the concepts of the originial and Slovenian ACE study and explains some concerns and criticisms of ACE studies. This is followed by an overview of relevant professional theories, and the demarcation of internal and external motives, which we assume to subconsciously or consciously influence the decision to pursue a profession. The purpose of the empirical research is to check whether there are differences between students of social pedagogy (hereinafter SP) and students of pharmacy in the motives for deciding on their studies and the differences between their assessment of ACE. The master's thesis reveals the occurrence of ACE in an individual group of students, and the correlation between the assessment of ACE and the motives for choosing a profession. Furthermore, we deepen this with the providers of care and helping professions, where we are interested in their views on the decision for their profession, in connection with their assessment of the ACE and cooping with stressful situations at work. In order to better understand the studied issues, we used a combined approach with quantitative and qualitative methodology. The sample includes a total of 152 female students (81 social pedagogy students and 71 pharmacy students) and five professionals working in the field of procedural (three social pedagogues) and crisis (firefighter and rescuer) interventions. The findings show that SP students have a higher ACE score and decide to a greater extent for their profession based on their internal motives. Both groups of female students also differ in the motives that contribute to the decision to pursue their profession. SP students put greater importance to motives, such as: social orientation, empathy, personal satisfaction, joy to work, contribution to society and the desire to care for others, while for pharmacy students’ motives are, that they enjoy their work, are more science-oriented, want to work on themselves and help society. The correlation between the ACE score and the internal motive of researching and solving one's personal problems was confirmed in the group of SP students. We perceived positive feelings (and feedback) when providing help, an ambivalent form of attachment, childhood experiences and mentors during adolescence as motives important in deciding on the profession of our interviewees. As extremely important in dealing with stress, in addition of support of the team and good relations, we also perceived longer years of service.
Secondary keywords: Krizna intervencija (psihiatrične službe);Otroci;Poklici;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
File type: application/pdf
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Socialna pedagogika
Pages: 110 str.
ID: 15287345