(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Živa Penko (Author), Miro Cerar (Mentor)

Abstract

Z vidika načela delitve oblasti se v Republiki Sloveniji postavlja vprašanje, v katero izmed ustavno določenih vej oblasti spada državno tožilstvo. Ustava Republike Slovenije izrecno ne določa položaja državnega tožilstva v okviru delitve oblasti. Magistrsko diplomsko delo zato njegov položaj analizira s pregledom ureditve v tujih pravnih sistemih, organizacijskega in funkcionalnega vidika skozi domači pravni red in formalnih ter neformalnih vplivov na delo državnih tožilcev kot nosilcev funkcije pregona. Na podlagi opravljene analize magistrsko diplomsko delo sklene, da ima državno tožilstvo v Republiki Sloveniji mesto znotraj izvršilne veje oblasti. Ne glede na to, državni tožilci pri opravljanju funkcije kazenskega pregona uživajo visoko stopnjo avtonomije, saj so vezani le na ustavo in zakon, dopustno vplivanje pa se v omejenem obsegu vrši le v okviru zakonsko določenih mehanizmov nadzora. Kljub temu pa so zaradi trenutne stopnje pravne in politične kulture deležni tudi številnih neformalnih pritiskov. Magistrsko diplomsko delo tako zaključi, da je visoka stopnja avtonomije državnih tožilcev znotraj izvršilne veje oblasti ustrezna in posledično odsvetuje pomik v smeri proti večji funkcionalni odvisnosti od izvršilne veje oblasti.

Keywords

načelo delitve oblasti;državno tožilstvo;izvršilna veja oblasti;Ustava Republike Slovenije;samostojnost;neodvisnost;mehanizmi nadzora;formalni vplivi;neformalni vplivi;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [Ž. Penko]
UDC: 347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 110299907 Link will open in a new window
Views: 173
Downloads: 73
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Prosecution and the principle of separation of powers
Secondary abstract: The principle of separation of powers begs the question where is the place of the state prosecution within the constitutionally determined branches of government in the Republic of Slovenia. The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia does not explicitly determine the position of the state prosecution within the framework of separation of powers. Hence, the master’s thesis analyses its position through an overview of foreign legal systems, organisational and functional perspective through the national legal order, and formal as well as informal influences on work of state prosecutors as holders of function of prosecution. Based on said analysis, the master’s thesis concludes that the state prosecution in the Republic of Slovenia fits into the executive branch. Nonetheless, when conducting criminal prosecution, state prosecutors enjoy high level of autonomy, since they are bound only by the constitution and laws, while permissible interference only takes place to a very limited extent within the statutorily determined supervisory mechanisms. However, due to the current level of legal and political culture, state prosecutors are also subject of numerous informal pressures. The master’s thesis thus concludes that the high level of state prosecutors’ autonomy within the executive branch is appropriate and consequently advises against the shift towards higher functional dependence from the executive branch.
Secondary keywords: separation of powers;state prosecution;executive branch;Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia;autonomy;independence;supervisory mechanisms;formal influences;informal influences;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: V, 48 f.
ID: 15317172
Recommended works:
, (magistrsko diplomsko delo)
, diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
, no subtitle data available