(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Anže Molan (Author), Karmen Lutman (Mentor)

Abstract

Nepremoženjska škoda je v najširšem smislu kot nasprotje premoženjski škodi razumljena v smislu slehernega posega v posameznikovo osebnostno področje, ki je opredeljeno s posameznikovimi osebnostnimi pravicami. Moderne pravne ureditve del tega spektra, tj. pravno priznano nepremoženjsko škodo, varujejo v okviru odškodninskega prava. Odškodninskopravno varstvo v zvezi z nepremoženjsko škodo je v kontinentalnih pravnih redih praviloma ožje od varstva v zvezi s premoženjsko škodo. Ožji pristop k odškodninskopravnemu varstvu nepremoženjske škode izhaja iz zgodovinske zadržanosti zakonodajalcev glede priznavanja nepremoženjskih interesov kot nečesa, kar bi bilo lahko predmet zasebnega oz. odškodninskega prava. Ta zadržanost pa je bila spričo številnih zgodovinskih dogodkov v pravni teoriji in sodni praksi kmalu presežena. Ta trend obstaja še danes, saj velja, da je predmetno področje eno izmed najatraktivnejših snovi pravnega raziskovanja. Kljub trendu razširjanja priznavanja odškodninskopravnega varstva glede nepremoženjske škode ostaja ta vidik kontroverzen in v precejšnji meri še vedno zaznamovan z zgodovinsko zadržanim pristopom, kar se ne odraža le v zakonskih ureditvah, temveč tudi v pravni doktrini in sodni praksi, s čimer se ukvarja dotično magistrsko diplomsko delo. Delo obravnava nemško in slovensko odškodninskopravno varstvo nepremoženjske škode v primerjalnopravnem kontekstu, pri čemer se predmet primerjave osredinja predvsem na oblike in funkcije nepremoženjske škode v obravnavanih pravnih redih.

Keywords

odškodninsko pravo;povrnitev škode v denarju;nepremoženjska škoda;oblike nepremoženjske škode;funkcije nepremoženjske škode;primerjalnopravna analiza;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [A. Molan]
UDC: 347.4/.5(043.2)
COBISS: 111081219 Link will open in a new window
Views: 183
Downloads: 81
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Forms and functions of non–pecuniary damage in Slovenian and German law
Secondary abstract: In contrast to pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage is understood in the broadest sense to mean any interference with an individual's personality, as defined by the individual's personality rights. Modern legal systems protect part of this spectrum, i.e. legally recognised non-pecuniary damage, in the context of tort law. In continental jurisdictions however, the protection of non-pecuniary damage is generally narrower than that of pecuniary damage. The narrower approach to the protection of non-pecuniary damage in tort stems from the historical reticence of legislators to recognise non-pecuniary interests as something that could be the subject of private or tort law. However, legal theory and case-law soon overcame such reticence in the light of a number of historical developments. This trend continues to this day, as the subject area is considered to be one of the most attractive areas of legal research. Despite this trend, the legal protection of non-pecuniary damage remains controversial and to a considerable extent still marked by a historically restrained approach, reflected not only in the statutory provisions but also in legal doctrine and case-law, which is the subject of the present master's thesis. The master's thesis examines the German and Slovenian tort law protection of non-pecuniary damage in a comparative legal context, focusing in particular on the forms and functions of non-pecuniary damage in the two legal systems under comparison.
Secondary keywords: tort law;pecuniary damages;non-pecuniary damage;forms of non-pecuniary damage;functions of non-pecuniary damage;comparative law analysis;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: IX, 48 f.
ID: 15367985