Razgovor z otrokom v postopku preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj

diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija

Ana Vrečko (Author), Peter Umek (Mentor)

Abstract

Otroci imajo zelo dober spomin. Zelo dobro si zapomnijo stvari, ki se jim zgodijo. Ker so v primeru preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj, to zelo travmatični dogodki, si jih zapomnijo še bolj jasno. Vprašanja, ki jih postavljamo otrokom morajo biti zelo dobro premišljena. Zato smo potrebovali zelo veliko časa, da smo izbrali primerna vprašanja za naš eksperiment. Predvidevali smo, da si bodo otroci stvari zelo dobro zapomnili in da tudi po preteku enega dneva ne bodo pozabili veliko stvari. Izkazalo pa se je, da se, na splošno gledano, velik odstotek otrok ni spomnil odgovorov na določena vprašanja. Zelo pogosto so odgovarjali, da ne vedo, kljub temu, da so bili zelo motivirani za sodelovanje. Razgovor je najboljše začeti z odprtimi vprašanji. Na žalost pa z njimi navadno ne dobimo dovolj podrobnosti, še posebej pri mlajših otrocih. To lahko potrdimo z našim eksperimentom, v katerem so otroci na odprti vprašanji dajali zelo kratke odgovore. Čeprav se moramo v praksi izogibati sugestivnim vprašanjem, smo v eksperimentu načrtno postavili dve sugestivni vprašanji, ki sta otroke zelo zavedli. Na eno ni nihče odgovoril pravilno, na vprašanje, ki je bilo postavljeno zavajajoče, pa sta samo dva otroka od petnajstih odgovorila pravilno. Iz našega eksperimenta je razvidno, da starost ni dober pokazatelj kompetentnosti otrok. Otroci v eksperimentu so bili večinoma na pragu vstopa v osnovno šolo. Torej smo, glede na njihovo starost, pričakovali večje spominske zmožnosti. Dejstvo pa je, da se otroci zelo razlikujejo med seboj. Pri nekaterih potekajo spoznavni, kognitivni in govorni razvoj hitreje, kot pri drugih. Vsakega otroka moramo torej obravnavati kot indivuduum in prilagoditi intervju njegovim zmožnostim.

Keywords

kazniva dejanja;preiskovanje;priče;otroci;zaslišanje;informativni pogovor;sugestibilnost;verodostojnost;spomin;diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2013
Source:	[Ljubljana
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher:	A. Vrečko]
UDC:	159.9:340.6(043.2)
COBISS:	2590954
Views:	1285
Downloads:	300
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	Children recall different events in their lives very well. They have very good memory, especially for traumatic events. We have to be careful when choosing questions. That is why it was very challenging for us to form appropriate questions for our interview. We asumed that the children are going to remember very well what happened and that they will not forget a lot of thnigs in a period of one day. But as it turned out, a lot of children did not remember the answers to our questions. Their answers were frequently: »I do not know.« even though their motivation was high. It is best to start an interview with open-ended questions. Unfortunately this type of questions does not elict enough information. Especially when talking to younger children. We draw the same conclusions with children in our experiment. We chose two suggestive questions for our experiment despite the fact that it is advised to avoid this type of questions. We found out that children had a lot of trouble with this two questions. They all answered wrong to one question, and only two out of fifteen, gave correct answer to a leading question. We can conclude by saying that age is not the right indicator of competence. Children in our experiment were just on the verge of going to school and that is why we predicted they will recall more details. But the fact is that there are many differences in children's development. And that is why we must treat every child as an individual and adjust the interview according to their capability.
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages:	85 str.
Keywords (UDC):	philosophy;psychology;filozofija;psihologija;psychology;psihologija;social sciences;družbene vede;law;jurisprudence;pravo;pravoznanstvo;law in general;legal methods and auxiliary sciences;auxiliary legal sciences;forensic psychology;forensic chemistry;forensic medicine;pomožne pravne znanosti;sodna psihologija;sodna kemija;sodna medicina;
ID:	15755