Uporaba instituta exceptio illegalis na področju upravnega prava

pravne podlage in praktični izzivi

Matevž Bedič (Author), Bruna Žuber (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko diplomsko delo obravnava pravni institut exceptio illegalis, osredotoča pa se na njegovo uporabo pri razlagi upravnih predpisov. Uvodoma je opredeljena vsebina tega instituta, predstavljeni so tudi temelji presoje ustavnosti in zakonitosti podzakonskih predpisov. Nadalje je opisana neuspela ustavna reforma, s katero je predlagatelj želel pristojnosti za presojo ustavnosti in zakonitosti izvršilnih predpisov prenesti z ustavnega na redno sodstvo. Ta ideja se je delno odrazila v ureditvi Zakona o urejanju prostora, čemur je v nalogi namenjen poseben razdelek. Naloga dodaja pregled (upravno)sodne ter upravne prakse. V ločenem poglavju prek primerjalnopravne analize ugotavljam, kako je presoja podzakonskih predpisov urejena v nekaterih evropskih državah. Delo zaključujem s komentarjem o morebitnem noveliranju tega področja (de lege ferenda). Exceptio illegalis je institut, katerega temelje določa 125. člen Ustave Republike Slovenije, ki pravi, da so sodniki vezani (le) na ustavo in zakon. Gre za odstop od veljavnih pravnih aktov, saj mora sodišče v primeru neustavnega oz. nezakonitega izvršilnega predpisa njegovo uporabo zavrniti. Drugačen je položaj za upravne organe, pri tem pa teorija in sodna praksa ločujeta med t. i. absolutno in relativno vezanostjo. Bistveno je, da se spregled nezakonitega podzakonskega predpisa izčrpa s konkretnim primerom. Povedano drugače, odklon učinkuje zgolj inter partes. Predpis tako zavezuje še naprej, vse dokler ga Ustavno sodišče ne odpravi oz. razveljavi. Upoštevajoč ustavnosodno prakso pa je uspešno izpodbijanje izvršilnih predpisov vse prej kot preprosta naloga.

Keywords

exceptio illegalis;podzakonski predpisi;načelo zakonitosti;hierarhija pravnih aktov;upravno pravo;ustavno pravo;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2022
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[M. Bedič]
UDC:	342.9(043.2)
COBISS:	112937731
Views:	266
Downloads:	117
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	The use of the exceptio illegalis institution in administrative law: legal bases and practical challenges
Secondary abstract:	The Master's thesis deals with the legal institution of exceptio illegalis, with a special focus on its use in interpreting administrative regulations. As an introduction, the contents of the said institution are defined, and the basis of judicial review of regulatory provisions is presented. Furthermore, the unsuccessful constitutional reform is described, with which the proposer intended to pass on the judgment of constitutionality and lawfulness of executive regulations from the constitutional judiciary to ordinary judiciary. Despite the reform’s unsuccess, the idea was later partially reflected in the structure of the Spatial Management Act, which the thesis dedicates a separate section to. Following is an overview of judicial and administrative practice. A separate chapter features a comparative analysis. The thesis is completed with a commentary on potential amendments of the field in question (de lege ferenda). Exceptio illegalis is an institution defined by Article 125 of the Constitution of Slovenia, which states that judges are (only) bound by the constitution and by law. Since the court must reject the use an executive regulation if the said regulation is unlawful, this poses a deviation from valid legal acts. The position is different for administrative authority, while theory and legal practice differentiate between the so-called absolute and relative bindings. It is essential that a disregard of an illegal administrative regulation is exhausted with a concrete case. In other words, the deviation only has an inter partes effect – the regulation is binding until the Constitutional court eliminates or nullifies it. Taking into consideration constitutional juridical practises, successfully rebutting executive regulations is anything but an easy task.
Secondary keywords:	exceptio illegalis;administrative regulations;principle of legality;hierarchy of legal norms;administrative law;constitutional law;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	VII, 38 f.
ID:	15776727