(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Katarina Vrišer (Author), Igor Kaučič (Mentor)

Abstract

Ustavna presoja se je kot eden izmed temeljev moderne države začela razvijati ravno v različnih evropskih državah. Vendar pa se položaj, ki ga uživajo ustavna sodišča (ter njim sorodni organi) znotraj samih držav članic Evropske Unije, razlikuje. Namen magistrske naloge je preko razdelitve držav v štiri temeljne skupine prikazati tako skupne značilnosti kot tudi razlike med posameznimi ureditvami. Pri tem naloga izhaja iz pojma položaja kot le tega opredeljuje ustava posamezne države članice - tako iz formalne umestitve instituta v njenem besedilu, kot tudi iz izrecne dikcije, ki jo vsebujejo njene določbe. V prvem delu magistrskega dela so predstavljene temeljne značilnosti različnih oblik sodobnih modelov presoje ustavnosti, vključno z delitvijo le teh na različne sisteme ustavne presoje, ter definicijami osnovnih pojmov, relevantnih za razumevanje predstavitev konkretnih ureditev. Drugi del zajema podrobnejše predstavitve osnovnih značilnosti položajev, ki jih ustavna sodišča (oziroma njim sorodni organi) zasedajo v izbranih državah članicah Evropske Unije. Zaradi preglednosti so slednje na podlagi pripadnosti posameznim sistemom ustavne presoje razdeljene v štiri skupine: zunajsodni, sodni sistem z ustavnim sodiščem, sodni sistem rednih sodišč ter mešani sistem.

Keywords

ustavna sodišča;ustavno pravo;ustave;Evropska unija;države članice;primerjave;ustavna presoja;sistemi ustavne presoje;sodni sistemi;zunajsodni sistemi;mešani sistemi;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [K. Vrišer]
UDC: 342.565.2(4-6EU)(043.2)
COBISS: 124554243 Link will open in a new window
Views: 49
Downloads: 12
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Constitutional position of Constitutional Courts in Member States of the European Union
Secondary abstract: Constitutional review is generally regarded as one of the fundaments of the rule of law. Its beginnings can be traced back to several European countries. Nonetheless, the position individual Constitutional Courts (and similar institutions) enjoy all throughout Europe differs from country to country. The aim of this dissertation is therefore to point out both the common characteristics and the distinctions between different systems. In this dissertation, "the position" is understood through the way individual Constitutions define it - both through its positioning in the constitutional provisions, and through the explicit definition, if such a definition is provided in a specific Constitution. The first part of the dissertation deals with the principal characteristics of different models of constitutional review. This includes the classification of the models into the four core groups, and the definitions of fundamental legal terminology, necessary for understanding the following presentations of concrete examples of constitutional arrangements. In the second part, the focus is on the fundamental characteristics of the positions, occupied by the Constitutional Courts in the chosen Member States of the European Union. For a more comprehensive and coherent display these countries are divided into four groups, based on the four basic models of constitutional review.
Secondary keywords: constitutional courts;constitutional law;constitutions;European Union;Member States;comparative study;constitutional review;models of constitutional review;judicial review;non-judicial review;mixed model;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 50 f.
ID: 16391522