diplomsko delo
Abstract
Temeljna načela v upravnem postopku predstavljajo minimalne procesne standarde in so obvezna
splošna pravila vsakega upravnega postopka. Organ mora pri svojem delovanju spoštovati
vsa temeljna načela. Namen diplomskega dela je bil opozoriti na pomen temeljnih načel in
predstaviti pomen učinkovitosti odločanja v upravnih postopkih. Namen dela je še bil ugotoviti
kršitve temeljnih načel. Kršitev le-teh pomeni slabo upravo in praviloma nezakonitost,
lahko tudi neustavnost. Slaba uprava pomeni kršitev temeljnih načel, kar prinaša
dolgotrajne postopke in zamude pri izdajanju odločb ter pomanjkljivo vodenje upravnih
postopkov.
S pomočjo analize sodne prakse, različnih sodb in sklepov smo ugotovili, katero je najbolj
problematično in največkrat kršeno temeljno načelo Zakona o splošnem upravnem
postopku. Analizirali smo različne sodbe s pomočjo sodne prakse, kjer smo sodbe omejili na sodbe
izdane s strani Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije (VSRS), in ugotovili, da je to načelo
zaslišanja stranke, ki je bilo kršeno v 80 % vseh analiziranih odločb in sklepov.
Raziskali smo, ali so temeljna načela zapisana v hierarhičnem vrstnem redu. Z analizo
znanstvene literature smo prišli do ugotovitev, da niso, a vseeno lahko poudarimo krovno načelo, ki
je načelo zakonitosti, na katerem so zasnovana vsa nadaljnja načela. Načela se med sabo povezujejo
in dopolnjujejo.
Predstavila sem vseh devet temeljnih načel Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku ter
ugotovila njihovo povezanost z Ustavo Republike Slovenije (URS) in z drugimi načeli v Evropi. Tako
je na primer načelo zakonitosti neposredno vezano na 120. člen URS. Delo bo lahko pozitivno
vplivalo na uradne osebe, ki se vsakodnevno srečujejo z uporabo in uveljavljanjem temeljnih načel v
upravnih postopkih. Tako se bodo bolj zavedali posledic neupoštevanja temeljnih načel in bodo
pozorni na temeljna načela, ki so bolj problematična in posledično zmanjšali kršitve le-teh.
Keywords
temeljna načela;Zakon o splošnem upravnem postopku;upravni postopek;analiza sodne prakse;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2022 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UL FU - Faculty of Administration |
Publisher: |
[A. Sovič] |
UDC: |
3.077.3(497.4)(043.2) |
COBISS: |
124979459
|
Views: |
78 |
Downloads: |
38 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
The importance and role of fundamental principles in administrative proceedings |
Secondary abstract: |
The basic principles in the administrative procedure represent minimum procedural
standards and are mandatory general rules of every administrative procedure. In their
operation, the authorities must respect all fundamental principles. The final thesis aimed to draw
attention to the importance of fundamental principles and provide support for the importance of
decision-making efficiency in legal procedures.
Using the analysis of judicial practice, various judgements and decisions, I have found out which
the most problematic and most frequently violated fundamental principle of The General
Administrative Procedure Act is. It is the principle of the client hearings, which was violated in
80% of all analysed decisions and conclusions.
With the help pf the analysis of court practice, various judgments and decisions, I found out which
is the most problematic and most frequently violated fundamental principle of the General
Administrative Procedure Act. I analysed various judgments with the help of case law, where I
limited the judgments to judgments issued by the Supreme Court, and found that this is the
principle of hearing the parties, which was violated in 80% of all analysed decisions and orders.
The aim of the work was to determine whether the fundamental principles are written down
in a hierarchical order. By analyzing the scientific literature, I came to the conclusion that
they are not, but we can still emphasize the overarching principle, which is the principle
of legality, on which all subsequent principles are based. The principles are interconnected and
complementary. The most important principle is the principle of legality, while all principles
together represent minimum procedural standards in administrative procedures.
I presented all nine basic principles of the Act on General Administrative Procedure and
established the connection with the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and with other
principles in Europe. For example, the principle of legality is directly linked to Article 120 of
the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. The work will have a positive impact on
individuals who encounter the application an enforcement of fundamental principles in
administrative procedures. They will pay attention to those principles that are more
problematic and consequently reduce their violations. |
Secondary keywords: |
fundamental principles;The General Administrative Procedure Act;administrative procedure;analysis of judicial practice; |
Type (COBISS): |
Bachelor thesis/paper |
Study programme: |
1000530 |
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): |
1970-01-01 |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za upravo |
Pages: |
X, 38 str. |
ID: |
16469439 |