Pravna epistemologija (v časih) razkroja

Abstract

Pravna onto-epistemologija je nerazločljiva od kontekstov, v katerih vznikajo pravni pojavi. Čeprav naša družba, kot mnoge pred njo, živi v pričakovanju apokalipse in krize, jo zaznamuje neusmiljena zapoved optimizma. Ta paradoks se kristalizira v zahtevi po produkciji rešitev za nerešljive, skrivnostne zagonetke, hkrati pa nemir generira več (seveda vedno povezanih) pojavov - od pandemične (samo)izolacije, globalnega segrevanja do spremenjenega položaja suverene države v teoriji in praksi. Avtorica se osredotoči na usodo suverene države kot vzorčni primer predpostavk pravne onto-epistemologije in motivacij ter odzivov discipline na postmoderne metamorfoze pravnih krajin. Namesto čislanega optimizma se obrne k pesimistični filozofiji Emila Ciorana, s katero zapolni vrzel med znanstvenimi in poljudnimi odzivi na vsesplošni razkroj in anksioznost ter vpraša, ali se je tudi (v) razkroju mogoče smejati.

Keywords

onto-epistemologija;pesimizem;pravni pozitivizem;kritika;teorija države;pravni pluralizem;post-nacionalno pravo;Hans Kelsen;Emil Cioran;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2020
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
UDC:	165.731:340.1
COBISS:	46896643
ISSN:	1854-3839
Views:	54
Downloads:	20
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Legal epistemology (in the times) of decay
Secondary abstract:	Legal onto-epistemology cannot be divorced from the contexts that give birth to legal phenomena. Our society, as many before it, trembles in the anticipation of apocalypse and crisis, yet it is defined by an imperative of optimism. This paradox culminates in the demands for the solutions to the discomfort-generating instances like pandemic (self ) isolation, global warming or the altered position of the sovereign state in theory and practice. The author engages with the latter as an example of legal onto-epistemology’s presuppositions, motivations, and reactions to the postmodern transformations of legal landscapes. Instead of the venerated optimism the author turns to the pessimistic philosophy of Emil Cioran to fill the gap between scientific and popular reactions to the omnipresent decay and anxiety of our times. Is it still possible to laugh amidst the ruins (to be)?
Secondary keywords:	onto-epistemology;pessimism;legal positivism;critique;theory of state;legal pluralism;postnational law;
Type (COBISS):	Article
Pages:	str. 7-29, 193, 203
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ80
Issue:	[1]
Chronology:	2020
ID:	16479267