Osebna zaznava detektivov - analiza sodne prakse

diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo

Nina Kancilija (Author), Andrej Sotlar (Mentor), Miha Dvojmoč (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Detektivska dejavnost je zbiranje, obdelava, posredovanje informacij in podatkov ter svetovanje na področju preprečevanja kaznivih ravnanj, ki ga za naročnikove potrebe opravlja licenciran detektiv. Detektivi v skladu z zakonom uporabljajo upravičenje osebne zaznave, ki pomeni zbiranje informacij iz javnih ali na javnih krajih, javno dostopnih zaprtih in odprtih prostorov ter prostorov in krajev, ki so vidni iz javno dostopnega mesta. Pri izvajanju tega upravičenja se velikokrat gibljejo po robu zakona, kar nam utemeljujejo nekatere preučene sodne prakse. V sodni praksi nemalokrat naletimo na primere, v katerih je detektiv obtožen nezakonitega pridobivanja dokazov, zaradi uporabe tako imenovanih prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepov, nezakonite uporabe tehničnih sredstev in posega v zasebni prostor posameznika. Detektivi, s katerimi smo opravili intervjuje, si osebno zaznavo razlagajo kot vrednotenje s čutili pridobljenih informacij. Osebno zaznavo izvajajo skladno z določbami zakona, z neposrednim opazovanjem in/ali poslušanjem na javnih krajih ali iz javnih krajev, javno dostopnih odprtih in zaprtih prostorov ter krajev in prostorov, ki so vidni z javno dostopnega kraja in prostora. Ključna zaznana dejstva pogosto dokumentirajo z uporabo sredstev za slikovno snemanje, ko je to nujno potrebno. Detektivi menijo, da je zakonska dikcija osebne zaznave tako široka, da pri izvedbi te ne prihaja do nekih bistvenih odstopanj. Dva detektiva sta že imela primere, ki so bili predmet sodne preveritve pri čemer je sodišče je v njunih primerih razsodilo v njuno prid. Poudarili so, da mora detektiv pri izvajanju detektivske dejavnosti in pri pridobivanju podatkov in informacij ravnati v skladu z Zakonom o detektivski dejavnosti in drugimi zakoni, ravnati mora strokovno in je ne sme izvajati na način, s katerim bi posegal v zasebnost posameznika, pri čemer je v vsakem posamičnem primeru treba tehtati pravico do zasebnosti v odnosu do pravic naročnika ali javnega interesa (test sorazmernosti).

Keywords

osebna zaznava;detektivska dejavnost;diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2022
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher:	[N. Kancilija]
UDC:	351.746.2(043.2)
COBISS:	125335555
Views:	18
Downloads:	2
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Personal perception of detectives - analysis of judicial practice
Secondary abstract:	Detective activity is the collection, processing, provision of information and data and counselling in the field of crime prevention by a licensed detective for the client's needs. Under the law, detectives use the right to have a personal perception, which means collecting information from public or public places, publicly accessible closed and open spaces, and spaces and places that are visible from a publicly accessible place. In the exercise of this entitlement, they often move to the margins of the law, which is justified by some of the case-law examined. In the case-law, we often encounter cases in which a detective is accused of illegally taking evidence, using so-called covert investigative measures, illegally using technical means and interfering with an individual's private space. The detectives we interviewed interpret the personal perception as an evaluation with the senses of information obtained. Personal detection shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the law, by direct observation and/or listening in public places or from public places, open and enclosed spaces open and accessible, and places and spaces visible from a publicly accessible place and place. Key perceived facts are often documented using imaging resources when necessary. Detectives believe that the legal diction of personal perception is so broad that there are no significant deviations in the execution. Two detectives have already had cases that have been the subject of judicial review and the court has ruled in their favour in their cases. They stressed that, in carrying out detective activity and obtaining data and information, the detective must comply with the Detective Activity and Other Laws Act, be handled professionally and should not be carried out in a manner that would prejudice the privacy of the individual, and in any individual case the right to privacy in relation to the rights of the client or the public interest must be weighed (proportionality test).
Secondary keywords:	personal perception;detectives;detective activities;judicial practice and courts;Zaznavanje;Detektivi;Sodna praksa;Sodišča;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages:	VI f., 40 str.
ID:	16726399