Bo skupna kmetijska politika talka interesne politike tudi v prihodnje?

političnoekonomska analiza sprejemanja sprememb politike v letu 2008

Tina Fistravec (Author), Marko Lovec (Author), Emil Erjavec (Author)

Abstract

Skupna kmetijska politika (SKP) je temeljna in proračunsko najobsežnejša poltika Evropske unije (EU). Skupni imenovalec številnih kritik je obremenjenost SKP s togimi stališči posametnih držav in politično občutljivostjo držav članic za dohodkovne pritiske interesnih kmetijskih organizacij. Fischlerjev krog prenove SKP je sicer z uvedbo proizvodno nevezanih pomoči in alokacijsko logiko drugega stebra obrnil vzorec SKP, ohranil pa njeno interesno odvisnost. Članek obravnava zdravstveni pregled kot zadnjo stopnjo prenove SKP, ki je obenem izpolnitev in uresničitev Fischlerjeve reforme ter prvo sistemsko razglabljanje po Fischlerjevi reformi. S pomočjo politoloških modelov in analize na več ravneh odločanja članek dokazuje, da SKP med iztekajočo se in prihajajočo finančno perspektivo ostaja v okviru, ki ga narekujejo neto prejemnice sredstev EU ter da spreminjajoči se globalni konteksti oblikovanja interesov le počasi pripravljajo na možno spremembo razmerij med tradicionalnimi akterji.

Keywords

kmetijstvo;skupna kmetijska politika;CAP;EU;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2010
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publisher:	Zavod Republike Slovenije za makroekonomske analize in razvoj
UDC:	631
COBISS:	2604680
ISSN:	1318-2803
Parent publication:	IB revija
Views:	747
Downloads:	154
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The Common Agricultural policy (CAP), historically one of the major financially still the most extensive common policy of the European Union (EU), has been traditionally criticised for being fundamentally determined by inflexible national perceptions that stem from the political sensitivity of payments per farm. Although these characteristics, the consequence of a specific historical context, have contributed to the permanent reform tendencies, they have remained the most stubborn part of CAP until today. Fischler's phase of CAP reform, which changed the policy paradigm by introducing allocation logic for the second pillar and farm payments, is no exception. This article focuses on Healtk Check as the phase of the CAP reform process, bringing fulfilment and concentration, as well as the first serious reflection on Fischler's reform. Using policy models and multilevel governance analysis, the authors attempt to prove that in the light of the upcoming new financial perspective, CAP remains firmly in a framework determined by the net-receiving countries. the changing global and national contexts of interst formation only slowly alter circumstances for the potential redefinition of relations between the traditional actors.
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 19-26
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ44
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology:	2010
ID:	1730972