Abstract
The article derives from a presumption that debates on biological determination of gender identity are not convincing and that society is the main factor in the process of constructing gender identity. The authoress thus focuses on psychological construction of personality as a primary factor in gender identity formation. Models based on the critical approach to classical psychoanalytical models emphasize the importance of female dominance(or the lack of men) during the first years of child's life for gender identity formation. Strict and rigid division into female and male gender identity, which is reproduced in this way, obstructs the complete perception of the world and functioning within it. Through the process of forming gender identity, the authoress shows that the current changes in the field of gender roles do not necessary apply to changes in the field of gender identity as well. The authoress sees the latter as an origin of gender asymmetry and a place of repoduction of the existing patriarchal society.
Keywords
konstrukcija realnosti;spolnost;identiteta;spol;ženske;moški;spolna neenakost;seksualna dihotomija;družbene vloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
1998 |
Typology: |
1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
Organization: |
UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences |
Publisher: |
Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani |
UDC: |
316 |
COBISS: |
18558301
|
ISSN: |
0040-3598 |
Parent publication: |
Teorija in praksa
|
Views: |
967 |
Downloads: |
232 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
Unknown |
Secondary abstract: |
Prispevek izhaja iz predpostavke, da so razlage o biološki determiniranosti spolne identitete neprepričljive in da je glavni dejavnik konstrukcije spolne identitete družbeni vpliv; pri tem se avtorica osredotoči na psihološko konstrukcijo osebnosti kot primaren dejavnik formiranja spolne identitete. Modeli, ki slonijo na kritičnem pristopu h klasičnim psihoanalitskim modelom, poudarjajo pomen primata žensk (oz. odsotnosti moških) v prvih letih otrokovega življenja za formacijo spolne identitete. Stroga in toga ločitev na žensko in moško spolno identiteto, ki se tako re/producira, je inhibitorna za polno dojemanje sveta in funkcioniranje v njem. Avtorica preko procesa formiranja spolne identitete pokaže, da sedanje spremembe na področju spolnih vlog ne pomenijo nujno, da prihaja hkrati tudi do sprememb na področju spolne identite, ki ga vidi kot izvor asimetrije med spoloma in mesto reproduciranja obstoječe patristične družbe. |
URN: |
URN:NBN:SI |
Type (COBISS): |
Not categorized |
Pages: |
str. 441-454 |
Volume: |
ǂLet. ǂ35 |
Issue: |
ǂšt. ǂ3 |
Chronology: |
maj/jun. 1998 |
ID: |
1750757 |