Gorazd Meško (Author)

Abstract

V prispevku avtor predstavlja nekatere glavne ugotovitve viktimologije in jih primerja s prizadevanji gibanja za žrtve kaznivih dejanj. V klasični kriminologiji sta vloga in položaj žrtev pogosto zanemarjani, vendar je v viktimoloških raziskavah analiza interakcij med storilcem in žrtvijo šla že tako daleč da na koncu ni bilo mogoče več razlikovati med enim in drugim. V prispevku so posebej poudarjene ugotovitve o manjšem delu žrtev kaznivih dejanj, ki utrpijo hude psihološke posledice, ki imajo zanje in za njihove bližnje lahko usodne posledice v smislu social%nega funkcioniranja. V prispevku so predstavljene tri "vrste žrtev" in sicer žrtve vlomov, ropov in posilstev. Prispevek opozarja tudi na vprašanje o vlogi žrtve v kazenskem procesu ter opozarja na instrumentalno vlogo žrtve v kazenskem postopku, ko žrtev (oškodovanec) ni pojmovana kot žrtev. V tem položaju je namreč bolj orodje države za dokazovanje krivde obtoženemu, kar povzroča ogorčenost in kritičnost pri pristaših gibanja za žrtve.

Keywords

viktimizacija;viktimologija;kriminologija;kazenski postopek;kazensko pravo;Viktimologija;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani
UDC: 343.9
COBISS: 18913885 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0040-3598
Parent publication: Teorija in praksa
Views: 1535
Downloads: 172
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: The author introduces some main findings in victimology and compares them with attempts of movement for victims of criminal offence. Classical criminology often overlooks a role and position of victim. Victimological research analysis on interaction between perpetrator and victim went even so far that it was impossible to distinguish between those two. The article in particular emphasizes some findings on a smaller proportion of victims of criminal offence and their close relatives, who suffer intense psychological consequences, potentially having omnious difficulties with social functioning. Three 'sorts' of victims of burglary, robbery and rape are introduced. Special attention is given to the questions regarding a victim during a trial process, emphasizing the instrumental role of the victim during the trial process, when he/she is not defined in terms of 'victim', but rather being a state's instrument for proving the accused guilty. This causes indignation and criticism with adherents of movememnt for vicitms.
Secondary keywords: victimization;victimology;criminology;criminal proceeding;penal law;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 1076-1088
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ35
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ6
Chronology: nov./dec. 1998
ID: 1750980