Merila presoje dopustnosti dokaznih predlogov v upravnem sporu

(magistrsko diplomsko delo)

Laura Tratnik (Author), Bruna Žuber (Mentor)

Abstract

V pričujočem magistrskem diplomskem delu z naslovom Merila presoje dopustnosti dokaznih predlogov v upravnem sporu so na enem mestu zbrana in predstavljena merila presoje dokaznih predlogov, ki so se razvila v slovenski upravnosodni praksi. Dokazovanje v postopku predstavlja pomemben okvir in vodilo za ugotavljanje dejanskega stanja in tudi za pravilno apliciranje materialnega prava. Upravno sodišče kot prvostopenjsko sodišče ugotavlja dejansko stanje glede na že prej v celoti izveden dokazni postopek v upravnem postopku, kar pa ne pomeni nujno tudi omejitve pooblastil sodišča. Magistrsko diplomsko delo tako predstavi ustavna izhodišča meril in podlago za njihov razvoj v mednarodnih dokumentih, v nadaljevanju pa so predstavljeni ključni instituti dokaznega postopka. Pravica do izvajanja dokazov, ki stranki omogoča, da v postopku navaja dejstva in dokaze za varstvo svojih pravic, ni absolutna, saj je mogoča zavrnitev dokaznega predloga, če za to obstajajo ustavno dopustni razlogi. Dokazni predlog je mogoče zavrniti iz formalnih ali vsebinskih razlogov. V drugem delu magistrskega dela so merila predstavljena, zlasti pa merila pravočasnosti, substanciranosti, konkretizacije, popolnosti, potrebe in primernosti.

Keywords

ustavna procesna jamstva;dokazni postopek;dokazni predlog;trditveno in dokazno breme;upravni postopek;upravni spor;glavna obravnava;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2022
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[L. Tratnik]
UDC:	342(043.2)
COBISS:	137842691
Views:	27
Downloads:	9
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Criteria for assessing the admissibility of evidentiary proposals in an administrative dispute
Secondary abstract:	In the present master's thesis, entitled Criteria for Assessing the Admissibility of Evidentiary Proposals in an Administrative Dispute, the criteria for assessing evidentiary proposals that have been developed in Slovenian administrative judicial practice are collected and presented. The presentation of evidence in the procedure represents an important framework and guide to determine the actual situation and furthermore the correct application of substantive law. The administrative court, as a first-instance court, determines the actual situation based on the evidentiary procedure previously fully implemented in the administrative procedure. This does not necessarily mean a limitation of the court's powers in relation to the implementation of evidence. The master's thesis thus presents the constitutional starting points and the basis for development of the criteria in international documents. Key institutes of the evidentiary procedure will also be presented. Furthermore, the right to present evidence which allows the party to take actions to state in the procedure and evidence in an administrative dispute is not absolute. In case of constitutionally permissible reasons, it is possible to reject the evidentiary proposal. An evidentiary proposal can be rejected for permissible formal or substantive criteria. In the second part of the master's thesis, these criteria are presented, especially the criteria of time, substantiality, concretisation, completeness, necessity and appropriateness.
Secondary keywords:	constitutional procedural guarantees;evidentiary procedure;application to take evidence;assertion and burden of proof;administrative proceeding;administrative dispute;main hearing;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	VI, 52 f.
ID:	17687985