guidelines for academic practice
Sascha Kraus (Author), Matthias Breier (Author), Weng Marc Lim (Author), Marina Dabić (Author)

Abstract

Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the phi- losophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-par- simonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as inde- pendent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as stand- alone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.

Keywords

industrijska organizacija;informacijska tehnologija;inovacijska dejavnost;industrial organization;information technology;innovational activity;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.02 - Review Article
Organization: UL EF - Faculty of Economics
UDC: 005.3
COBISS: 128293891 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1863-6683
Views: 13
Downloads: 4
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: Slovenian
Secondary keywords: industrijska organizacija;informacijska tehnologija;inovacijska dejavnost;
Type (COBISS): Article
Pages: str. 2577-2595
Issue: ǂVol. ǂ16
Chronology: 2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
ID: 17688005