Damjan Kukovec (Author)

Abstract

Avtor preučuje, kako je pojem avtonomije prava Evropske unije, ki je organizacijsko načelo koherentnosti Sodišča EU, s katerim slednje zagotavlja enotnost in skladnost evropskega pravnega sistema ter prežema celotno sodno prakso Sodišča EU, imel ključno vlogo v odmevnih primerih pred Sodiščem EU, v katerih je bila neposredno vpletena Slovenija. Avtor najprej obravnava zadevo Detiček, prvi primer slovenskega predloga za predhodno odločanje, v kateri je Sodišče stopilo na najbolj sporno presečišče načela vzajemnega zaupanja in varstva človekovih pravic, sicer ključnih elementov avtonomije. V drugi, odmevni zadevi Arhivi je Komisija s tožbo zahtevala ugotovitev, da je Slovenija kršila nedotakljivost arhivov EU in s tem avtonomijo evropskih institucij ter izvajanja prava EU s tem, ko je enostransko zasegla dokumente na sedežu Banke Slovenije. V tretji, meddržavni zadevi Slovenija proti Hrvaški, pa je Sodišče ugotovilo, da ni pristojno za ugotovitev, ali je Hrvaška z neizvršitvijo arbitražne odločbe kršila pravo EU, ker arbitražni sporazum ni nikoli postal del pravnega reda EU. Avtor ugotavlja, da globlje razumevanje vloge avtonomije v pravnem razlogovanju Sodišča EU omogoča slovenskim pravnikom najboljše predvidevanje odločitev Sodišča, s tem pa tudi pravno razlogovanje, ki bo bolje artikuliralo interese Slovenije v jeziku prava EU.

Keywords

avtonomija prava Evropske unije;doslednost;koherentnost;Slovenija;organizacijsko načelo;Sodišče Evropske unije;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
UDC: 347.9:061.1EU
COBISS: 132637699 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1854-3839
Views: 35
Downloads: 13
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The synoptic vision of the Court of Justice and its importance for Slovenia
Secondary abstract: The author examines how the concept of autonomy of EU law, which represents the organisational principle of the coherence of the CJEU, ensuring the unity and coherence of the European legal system and permeating the entire case law of the CJEU, has played a key role in high-profile cases before the CJEU in which Slovenia was directly involved. The author first discusses the Detiček case, the first Slovenian reference for a preliminary ruling, in which the Court of Justice addressed a controversial area of intersection of the principle of mutual trust and the protection of human rights, key elements of autonomy. In the second case concerning the archives of the Slovenian central bank, the Commission sought a declaration that Slovenia had violated the inviolability of EU archives, and thus the autonomy of the European institutions and the autonomous implementation of EU law, by unilaterally seizing documents from the Bank of Slovenia headquarters. In the third case, Slovenia v Croatia, the Court found that it did not have jurisdiction to determine whether Croatia had violated EU law by failing to enforce an arbitral award because the arbitration agreement never became part of the EU legal order. The author concludes that a deeper understanding of the role of autonomy in the CJEU’s legal reasoning could enable Slovenian lawyers to better predict the Court’s decisions, and thus to better articulate Slovenia’s interests in the language of EU law.
Secondary keywords: autonomy of European Union law;coherence;consistency;Slovenia;organising principle;Court of Justice of the European Union;
Type (COBISS): Article
Pages: str. 43-67
Issue: ǂLetn. ǂ82
Chronology: 2022
DOI: 10.51940/2022.1.43-67
ID: 18140211