Analiza pravnih sredstev v upravnem postopku

diplomsko delo

Abstract

Pravna sredstva so z zakonom določena pravna orodja, ki strankam v upravnem postopku zagotavljajo izpodbijanje nezakonitih upravnih aktov. Slovenski Zakon o splošnem upravnem postopku (ZUP) določa eno redno pravno sredstvo – pritožba in pet izrednih pravnih sredstev. Namen raziskave je ugotoviti razmerje med vlaganjem pravnih sredstev v upravnem postopku na ravni upravnih enot in rezultate primerjati z drugimi organi javne uprave. Opravljena statistična metoda izkazov o delu organov javne uprave ugotavlja, da je na ravni upravnih enot vloženih 70 % pritožb, na ravni izbranih organov javne uprave pa 80 % pritožb, kar predstavlja približno tri četrtine vloženih pravnih sredstev. Absolutne bistvene postopkovne napake ZUP navaja v 2. odstavku 237. člena in predstavljajo hujše kršitve, ki vplivajo na pravilnost in zakonitost odločb. Analiza sodne prakse absolutnih bistvenih postopkovnih napak s pomočjo induktivne in deskriptivne metode ter analize znanstvene literature ugotavlja, da je v 60 % vseh analiziranih sodnih odločb in sklepov najpogosteje kršena 7. točka 2. odstavka 237. člena ZUP. Analiza pravnih sredstev in absolutnih bistvenih postopkovnih napak bo lahko pozitivno vplivala na delo uslužbencev v organih javne uprave, ki se dnevno srečujejo s primeri kršitev in posledično primeri pritožb. Na podlagi tega bodo na te kršitve bolj pozorni in se jih bodo trudili odpraviti. Prav tako ima delo pozitiven vpliv na stranke, ki nastopajo v upravnem postopku, saj bodo tudi one lahko bolj pozorne na kršitve, ki se pogosteje pojavljajo.

Keywords

pravna sredstva;pritožba;izredna pravna sredstva;absolutne bistvene postopkovne napake;upravni postopek;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2023
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UL FU - Faculty of Administration
Publisher:	[T. Turk]
UDC:	3.077.3:343.15(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS:	146290435
Views:	26
Downloads:	5
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Analysis of the remedies in administrative procedure
Secondary abstract:	Remedies are legal tools established by law to ensure that parties to an administrative procedure can challenge unlawful administrative acts. The Slovenian General Administrative Procedure Act provides for one ordinary remedy - an appeal - and five extraordinary remedies. The aim of the survey is to establish the relationship between the filing of administrative appeals at the level of administrative units and to compare the results with other public authorities. The statistical method carried out on the accounts of the work of the public administration bodies shows that 70% of complaints are lodged at the level of the administrative units and 80% of complaints at the level of the selected public administration bodies, representing about three quarters of the appeals lodged. Absolute essential procedural errors are listed in Article 237(2) of the ZUP and constitute serious infringements affecting the correctness and legality of decisions. The analysis of the case-law on absolute fundamental procedural errors using inductive and descriptive methods and the analysis of the scientific literature concludes that in 60% of all decisions and orders analysed, Article 237(2)(7) of the Civil Procedure Code is the most frequently infringed provision. The analysis of remedies and absolute fundamental procedural errors may have a positive impact on the work of civil servants, who are confronted with cases of misconduct and, consequently, cases of complaints on a daily basis. As a result, they will be more attentive to these infringements and will try hard to rectify them. The work also has a positive impact on the parties involved in the administrative procedure, as they will also be able to pay more attention to the infringements that occur more frequently.
Secondary keywords:	remedies;appeal;extraordinary remedies;absolute fundamental procedural errors;administrative procedure;
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme:	1000530
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za upravo
Pages:	X, 46 str.
ID:	18198306