diplomsko delo
Matej Noč (Author), Anton Bebler (Mentor)

Abstract

V diplomskem delu ugotavljamo, v kolikšni meri je strateško-operativna misel Carla von Clausewitza še vedno aktualna pri razumevanju dinamike sodobnih konvencionalnih oboroženih konfliktov. Z izbranimi zgodovinskimi primeri 20. stoletja poskušamo podpreti posamezna teoretična izhodišča Clausewitzeve teorije. Ker je ta preobsežna, da bi jo lahko učinkovito strnili v eno nalogo, se osredotočimo le na nekatere njene vidike. V diplomskem delu se v manjšem obsegu tudi ukvarjamo z metodami bojnega dejstvovanja v nasprotnikovem zaledju. Sem spadajo partizanske operacije, operacije onemogočanja iz zraka, manevriranje kopenskih oboroženih sil v zaledju nasprotnikovih položajev itd. Čeprav so te metode v teoriji zelo privlačne, se v realnosti velikokrat izkažejo za nezadostne. Zagovorniki manevrskega bojevanja in strategije posrednega pristopa jih poveličujejo, toda Clausewitz opozarja, da moramo biti pri njihovi rabi previdni, saj sile, ki so uporabljene v nasprotnikovem zaledju, ne morejo biti vključene v boje na fronti, in sile, ki prodirajo v globino nasprotnikove razporeditve, izpostavljajo lastno umičnico.

Keywords

operativna strategija;vojaška operacija;delovanje v zaledju;vojna dveh vrst;strateške kombinacije;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: [M. Noč]
UDC: 355.4(043.2)
COBISS: 152559619 Link will open in a new window
Views: 28
Downloads: 1
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The relevance of Clausewitz at the operational level of warfare
Secondary abstract: The purpose of this paper is to identify to what extent the strategic thought of Carl von Clausewitz is still relevant to understanding the dynamics of contemporary conventional armed conflicts. We will attempt to back individual theoretical bases of Clausewitzian theory with the use of historical examples from the 20th century. Clausewitz’s theory of war is far too extensive for one to thoroughly cover it in a paper of such dimensions, thus we will only be focused on certain aspects of it. To a lesser degree, we will also discuss the effectiveness of rear operations. Partisan operations, air interdiction operations, land forces maneuvering in enemy rear areas are all examples that fall under this category. Although these methods are thought to be very attractive in theory, they frequently fall short in practice. Glorified by proponents of maneuvre warfare and the strategy of indirect approach, Clausewitz warns that forces sent to operate against the enemy’s rear and flank are not avaliable for use against his front and those that penetrate deep into the enemy’s rear expose their own line of retreat.
Secondary keywords: operational strategy;military operation;rear operations;war of two kinds;strategic combinations;Vojaška znanost in umetnost vojskovanja;Vojaška strategija;Tehnologija;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages: 55 str.
ID: 18892302