Tvornost tujih in prevzetih glagolskih predpon v slovenščini

Gregor Perko (Author), Mojca Schlamberger Brezar (Author)

Abstract

V Toporišičevi slovnici (2000: 215) v poglavju Besedotvorje in podpoglavju o izpeljavi glagolov iz glagolov s predlogi in členki so med predponami navedene tudi naslednje tuje predpone: a- (atrofirati), ab- (abdicirati), ad-/a- (asistirati), de- (defenestrirati), de-/dez- (demaskirati, dezangažirati), dis- (diskriminirati), dis- (diskvalificirati), e- (elidirati), eks- (ekshumirati), in-/im- (inkorporirati; imobilizirati), inter- (interpolirati), re- (reorganizirati). V prispevku so besedotvorne operacije, ki temeljijo na navedenih predponah, analizirane v okviru leksematskega besedotvornega pristopa, zlasti glede vprašanja njihove tvornosti (živosti). Empirično podprta analiza, ki temelji na korpusih Nova Beseda in Gigafida, kaže, da se nobeden od naštetih glagolov ne izkaže kot tvoren in da je treba "navidezno" izpeljane glagole kljub razlikam, ki zadevajo posamezne predpone, obravnavati kot izposojenke.

Keywords

slovenščina;slovnica;Toporišičeva slovnica;glagoli;izpeljava glagoglov;tuje predpone;tvornost;izposojenke;Toporišič;Jože;1926-2014;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2016
Typology:	1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
UDC:	811.163.6'373.611:929Toporišič J.
COBISS:	62638178
Views:	4
Downloads:	0
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	In the grammar of Jože Toporišič (2000: 215) in the chapter Word formation under the title verb derivation with prepositions and particles, the following "loan" prefixes are listed: a- (atrofirati), ab- (abdicirati), ad-/a- (asistirati), de- (defenestrirati), de-/dez- (demaskirati, dezangažirati), dis- (diskriminirati), dis- (diskvalificirati), e- (elidirati), eks- (ekshumirati), in-/im- (inkorporirati; imobilizirati), inter- (interpolirati), re- (reorganizirati). In this paper, the operations of word formation are analysed within the theory of lexematic word formation approach underlining their productivity. This empirically based analysis on corpora Nova Beseda and Gigafida points out that no one amont the listed prefixes cannot be assumed as productive and that the "so called" derived verbs, in spite of differences among the prefixes should be treated as loan words.
Secondary keywords:	Slovene language;grammar;Toporišič's grammar;verb derivation;loan prefixes;productivity;loan words;
Type (COBISS):	Article
Pages:	Str. 173-180
ID:	19534531