Abstract

Modeli prometnoga opterećenja koji se primjenjuju pri proračunu novih mostova temelje se na konzervativnim pretpostavkama te se njihova upotreba u analizi postojećih mostova nije pokazala učinkovitom. Kod postojećih mostova preporučena je primjena modela prometnoga opterećenja temeljenog na mjerenju prometa u pokretu, koji osim osovinskoga opterećenja i razmaka, daje i podatke o ponašanju mosta pod prometnim opterećenjem. U ovome su radu dani pregled modela prometnoga opterećenja te smjernice o upotrebi podataka dobivenih mjerenjem prometa u pokretu prilikom ocjene stanja postojećih cestovnih mostova.

Keywords

prometna obtežba;tehtanje vozil med vožnjo;mostni WIM;ocenjevanje stanja;obstoječi mostovi;

Data

Language: Croatian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.02 - Review Article
Organization: ZAG - Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute
Publisher: Hrvatski savez građevinskih inženjera
UDC: 624
COBISS: 2515303 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0350-2465
Views: 27
Downloads: 11
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Modeliranje utjecaja prometnoga opterećenja u postupku ocjenjivanja postojećih cestovnih mostova
Secondary abstract: Traffic load models used for the design of new bridges are based on conservative assumptions and have not been proven efficient for assessing safety of existing bridges. In the case of existing bridges, it is reasonable to use load models that are based on bridge weigh-in-motion data which, in addition to axle loads and spacing of bridge-crossing vehicles, provide information on bridge behaviour under traffic load. This paper provides an overview of traffic load models, as well as guidelines on the use of weigh-in-motion data when assessing condition of existing road bridges.
Secondary keywords: traffic load;weigh-in-motion;bridge WIM;condition assessment;existing bridges;
Pages: str. 1153-1165
Volume: ǂVol. ǂ71
Issue: ǂbr. ǂ12
Chronology: 2019
DOI: 10.14256/JCE.2609.2019
ID: 23267974