doktorska disertacija
Nina Cek (Author), Viktorija Žnidaršič (Mentor), Ana Vlahek (Thesis defence commission member), Karel Zupančič (Thesis defence commission member), Suzana Kraljić (Thesis defence commission member)

Abstract

Doktorska disertacija se osredotoča na problematiko odškodninske odgovornosti za škodo, ki nastane v postopkih zdravljenja ter analizira različne pravne ureditve v Sloveniji in tujini. Osrednji cilj raziskave je predstaviti zgodovinski razvoj in aktualno stanje v primerjalnopravnih ureditvah. Njen namen je ugotoviti, ali predstavlja uvedba nekrivdnega odškodninskega sistema primerno rešitev za problematiko, ki se pojavlja na področju civilnega medicinskega prava. V raziskavi so obravnavani klasični odškodninski sistemi v državah, kot so Velika Britanija, Nemčija, Avstralija in ZDA. Poudarek je na vsebinskih in procesnih vidikih, sistemskih spremembah in tudi na predlogih za oblikovanje rešitev v smeri nekrivdnih odškodninskih shem. Posebna pozornost je namenjena francoski in belgijski ureditvi, kjer se združujejo elementi klasičnih in nekrivdnih odškodninskih sistemov. Osrednji del disertacije preučuje sisteme skandinavskih držav ter Nove Zelandije, ki imajo v svojih pravnih ureditvah oblikovano nekrivdno odškodninsko shemo. V slovenskem kontekstu se raziskava osredotoča na veljavno zakonodajo, obravnava zaznano problematiko v praksi ter primerja prednosti in slabosti uvedbe nekrivdne odškodninske sheme. Uvedba tovrstne sheme bi sicer lahko do neke mere povečala učinkovitost odškodninskega sistema in izboljšala položaj oškodovanih pacientov, vendar pa ta rešitev predstavlja zgolj eno od možnosti, ki po oceni avtorice ne pretehta nad gradualističnim pristopom k spremembam, za katerega se zavzema. V delu so podani konkretni predlogi za spremembe oziroma dopolnitve zakonodaje, ki bi lahko pozitivno prispevale k izboljšanju odškodninskega sistema na področju zdravniških napak v Republiki Sloveniji, pri čemer bi bile potrebne nadaljnje analize ekonomske narave, ki jih delo ne zajema.

Keywords

odškodninska odgovornost;zdravstveni sistem;nekrivdni odškodninski sistemi;gradualistični pristop;medicina in pravo;odškodninsko pravo;zdravniške napake;nekrivdne sheme;odškodninski sistemi;primerjalno pravo;medicinsko pravo;odškodnine;medical error;liability;healthcare system;no-fault compensation systems;gradualistic approach;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [N. Cek]
UDC: 347.4/.5:61(043.3)
COBISS: 221752835 Link will open in a new window
Views: 31
Downloads: 6
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: No-fault compensation schemes in healthcare
Secondary abstract: The dissertation focuses on the issue of liability for damages arising from medical treatment, analyzing various legal frameworks in Slovenia and abroad. The main objective of the research is to present the historical development and current state of comparative legal systems, with the purpose to determine whether the introduction of a no-fault compensation scheme would be an appropriate solution to the issues in the field of civil medical law. The research examines traditional compensation systems in countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and the United States, with an emphasis on substantive and procedural aspects, systemic changes, and proposals for solutions in the direction of no-fault compensation schemes. Special attention is given to the French and Belgian systems, where elements of both traditional and no-fault compensation systems are combined. The central part of the dissertation studies the systems that already introduced no fault compensation schemes, such as Scandinavian countries and New Zealand. In the context of Slovenia, the research focuses on current legislation, addresses the identified issues in practice, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of introducing a no-fault compensation scheme. While the introduction of such a scheme could potentially increase the efficiency of the compensation system and improve the position of injured patients, this solution represents only one option, which, according to the author, does not outweigh the gradualist approach to changes that the author advocates. The work provides concrete proposals for legislative changes or amendments that could positively contribute to the improvement of the compensation system in the field of medical liability in Slovenia, while noting that further economic analyses, which are not examined in the dissertation, would be necessary.
Secondary keywords: Objektivna odgovornost;Zdravstvo;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS): Doctoral dissertation
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 294 str.
ID: 25654079