Andraž Maček (Author), Janez Urevc (Author), Bojan Starman (Author), Miroslav Halilovič (Author)

Abstract

This paper aims to compare different heterogeneous test designs from the perspective of the confidence interval quantification of inversely identified parameters, where the influence of a DIC optical system systematic and random error are taken into account. Because the errors in optical measurement can arise from many reasons and sources, our methodology relies on the system's errors determined from initial sets of pictures acquired at the load-free state for hundreds of specimens (over 850 tests over the past three years). In thisway, a prior probability distribution of systematic and random error, arisen from the system initial settings and testing procedures are determined. Further, by conducting an inverse identification procedure of linear orthotropic elastic material parameters, the influence of the error distributions is studied for different types of heterogeneous specimens. The presented methodology determines the DIC bias and random error propagation through the inverse identification procedure to individual parameters. For each specimen design, confidence intervals of identified material parameters were determined. The results show the appropriateness of a specimen design for the identification of particular material parameters.

Keywords

heterogeni test;korelacija digitalne slike;meritve v polnem polju;interval zaupanja;mehansko testiranje;heterogeneous test;digital image correlation;full-field measurements;confidence intervals;mechanical testing;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.08 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution
Organization: UL FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
UDC: 004.932:62(045)
COBISS: 63325955 Link will open in a new window
Views: 18
Downloads: 4
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: Slovenian
Secondary keywords: heterogeni testi;korelacija digitalne slike;meritve v polnem polju;interval zaupanja;mehansko testiranje;
Type (COBISS): Other
Pages: Str. 1-8
DOI: 10.25518/esaform21.2415
ID: 25839071