Primerjava ergonomskih ocenjevalnih metod na primeru avtokleparske delavnice

magistrsko delo

Maruša Podbevšek (Author), Zvone Balantič (Mentor)

Abstract

V zaključnem delu smo za potrebe primerjave ugotovitev ergonomskih ocenjevalnih metod raziskali dve delovni mesti v storitvenem podjetju, ki se ukvarja z avtokleparstvom, ličarstvom in temnenjem stekel vozil. Delovni mesti smo ocenili z ergonomskimi ocenjevalnimi metodami KIM, OWAS, RULA REBA, ALLA in AULA. Za analizo delovnih mest smo uporabili digitalno kamero in formularje za izvedbo omenjenih metod. Z osebama, ki smo ju z ergonomskimi ocenjevalnimi metodami analizirali, smo opravili intervju in pri tem uporabili vprašalnik Ocena vpliva bolečine na delo. Z vprašalnikom smo pridobili podatke o bolečinah delavcev in možnih mišično-skeletnih boleznih, ki se lahko dolgoročno razvijejo. Ugotovili smo, ali se ocene, določene z ergonomskimi metodami, ujemajo z identificiranimi bolečinami delavcev na analiziranih delovnih mestih. Izvedli smo primerjalno analizo med ugotovitvami posameznih metod. Svoje analize smo primerjali z analizami ostalih raziskovalcev in ugotovili, da je za ocenjevanje dela v avtokleparski delavnici med vsemi metodami najbolj primerna metoda KIM in da metodi AULA in ALLA nista primerni za ocenjevanje takšnega dela. Ugotovili smo tudi, da metoda KIM za nerodne drže telesa med vsemi metodami najvišje oceni tveganje za dolgoročne mišično-skeletne bolezni delavcev na analiziranih delovnih mestih. Ob tem smo s testno študijo opredelili ukrepe za oblikovanje delovnega okolja in oblikovali usmeritve za uporabo pripomočkov za zmanjšanje možnosti mišično-skeletnih bolezni in bolečin zaradi opravljanja dela na delovnih mestih ličarstva in temnenja stekel vozil.

Keywords

ergonomija;ergonomske ocenjevalne metode;ergonomska analiza;delovno mesto;avtokleparstvo;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2025
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UM FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Publisher:	[M. Podbevšek]
UDC:	331.1
COBISS:	241208067
Views:	0
Downloads:	9
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Comparison of methods for ergonomic assessment using the example of an auto body shop
Secondary abstract:	In this thesis, we analysed two workplaces in a service company specialising in automotive body repair, vehicle painting, and vehicle window tinting, with the aim of comparing the findings of different ergonomic assessment methods. The workplaces were assessed using the KIM, OWAS, RULA, REBA, ALLA, and AULA ergonomic methods. We conducted the analysis using a digital camera and appropriate assessment forms for each method. Additionally, we interviewed the two workers included in the ergonomic assessments and used the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire to gather data on their pain and potential musculoskeletal disorders that may develop over time. We examined whether the assessments derived from ergonomic methods aligned with the reported pain symptoms of the workers in the observed job roles. A comparative analysis of the findings from each method was carried out. Our results were then compared with findings from other researchers. We found that, among all the methods, the KIM method is the most suitable for assessing tasks in automotive body shops, while the AULA and ALLA methods are not appropriate for such types of work. Furthermore, we found that the KIM method consistently rated the risk of long-term musculoskeletal disorders due to awkward postures higher than the other methods. Based on the test study, we also proposed measures for improving the working environment and provided guidelines for the use of ergonomic aids aimed at reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and work-related pain at vehicle painting and window tinting workstations.
Secondary keywords:	Ergonomija;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za organizacijske vede
Pages:	VI, 66 f., [49] f. pril.
ID:	26373038