Katja Meško Kuralt (Author)

Abstract

Z namenom uporabe novih tehnologij, ki jih znanost razvija, se pojavljajo tudi etične dileme, predvsem z vidika daljnosežnih učinkov na človeka, živali, rastline in okolje. Še posebej velja izpostaviti učinke, ki jih ni mogoče opredeliti oz. so nedoločljivi do te mere, da se tveganj za človeka, živali, rastline in okolje ne da (povsem) izključiti. Kljub temu menim, da je tovrstne učinke mogoče upravljati s tem, da se jih nenehno analizira in do njih opredeljuje, in sicer tako znanstveno kot neznanstveno oz. poljudno. Namen članka je vzpodbuditi argumentirano razpravo o etičnih in družbenih posledicah urejanja človekovega genoma, upoštevaje zanesljive in z dokazi podprte informacije glede uporabe novih tehnologij v daljšem časovnem obdobju.

Keywords

etika;bioetika;gensko spremenjeni organizmi;nove tehnologije;previdnostno načelo;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
UDC: 364-787.9:604.6
COBISS: 182209027 Link will open in a new window
Parent publication: Studia Iuridica Miscellanea
Views: 0
Downloads: 0
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The impact of ethics on the use of genetically modified organisms
Secondary abstract: With the goal of utilising new scientific technologies, ethical dilemmas arise, particularly in terms of far-reaching effects on humans, animals, plants and the environment. Special attention should be paid to the effects that are hard to recognize. The reasons for not recognizing the effects can be different (e.g. whether the effect of the use of new technology on humans has not yet been identified; whether the effect of the use of new technology on humans has not yet been recognized, etc.). Such effects on humans, animals and plants represent risks that cannot be (completely) excluded. Nevertheless, I believe that such effects are manageable by continuously analyzing them. Timely recognition of the risks that new technologies pose to humans, animals, plants and the environment necessitates both scientific and non-scientific recognition. The purpose of the article is to encourage a reasoned discussion about ethical and social risks, as well as the consequences that risks have on the (human) genome. Last but not least, especially in the field of tampering with the (human) genome, I want to encourage the reader to think critically about the use of new technologies over a longer period of time.
Secondary keywords: ethics;bioethics;genetically modified organisms;new technologies;precautionary principle;
Pages: Str. 495-527
DOI: 10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.16
ID: 27111690