From Li Zehou to Kant and back, or the precarious relation between apriorism and empiricism

Abstract

We may describe Li Zehou and Henry Rosemont as examples of philoso- phers whose not just “compare.” Yet, there is a specific sense in which Li ‘s texts may still appear as “Chinese philosophy” and Rosemont’s as “American.” This causes difficulties which Jana Rošker’s paper meditates on. The thinkers discussed in this volume might be “beyond comparison,” but distinctive cultural elements remain. Many “comparative” interpretations of Li Zehou, Rošker argues, are methodologi- cally Western, but are still informed by traditional Chinese ideas. Specifically, she describes how Li Zehou interacts with Kant. Li’s work as a “process of transforming the empirical into the transcendental can be seen as a kind of synthesis of empiri- cism and rationalism.” This is, of course, problematic. Rošker summarizes: “Kant’s system is completely incompatible with Li Zehou’s philosophy.” However, the latter still engages productively with the former through what Rošker calls the process of “the sublation of philosophy.” If we respect differences and understand comparisons in this way, we better understand both Li’s thought and comparative philosophy.

Keywords

kitajska filozofija;primerjalna filozofija;globalna filozofija;konfucijanstvo;Li Zehou;Chinese philosophy;comparative philosophy;global philosophy;Confucianism;

Data

Language:	English
Year of publishing:	2025
Typology:	1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
UDC:	1
COBISS:	244688643
Views:	76
Downloads:	14
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	Slovenian
Secondary keywords:	kitajska filozofija;primerjalna filozofija;globalna filozofija;konfucijanstvo;Li Zehou;
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	2026-07-15
Pages:	Str. 111-123
DOI:	10.1007/978-981-96-3321-0_9
ID:	27111817